Skip to main content

Kincaid’s Statement on Protecting Women’s Sports and Sex‑Based Privacy – WA‑01

 








For Immediate Release

Contact: Kincaid for Congress

Website: kincaidforcongress.com

Date: February 6, 2026

Press Release  ·  WA-01

Kincaid: Protecting Women's Sports and Sex-Based Privacy in Washington's 1st District

Press statement from Kincaid for Congress — WA-01

Women and girls are entitled to fair athletic competition, physical safety, and personal privacy in sex segregated environments. These protections are grounded in long-standing principles of equality and security. Upholding them is both a matter of basic fairness and of maintaining public trust in the institutions that serve women and girls.

This effort is not about exclusion. It is about establishing clear, consistent standards that safeguard women's opportunities, dignity, and rights and about having the courage to say so plainly when others will not.


Policy Priorities

1. Ensuring Fairness in Women's and Girls' Sports

Women's sports exist to promote equitable athletic competition and to preserve the opportunities  scholarships, records, roster spots, and physical safety  that would otherwise be compromised without distinct, protected categories.

To maintain these purposes, I support federal and state policies that:

  • Define female athletic categories on the basis of biological sex
  • Establish uniform eligibility standards for governing bodies, schools, and athletic associations, preventing the inconsistent and improvised rules that currently create confusion and unfairness
  • Reaffirm Title IX's original intent to protect equal athletic opportunity for women and girls
  • Guarantee due process, transparency, and procedural consistency in eligibility determinations and policy enforcement

Every athlete deserves safety, respect, and a level playing field. Fair competition requires distinct categories that reflect biological realities, while ensuring that all students are treated with integrity and dignity.

2. Safeguarding Sex Based Privacy in Intimate and Protected Settings

Sex specific privacy and safety standards are essential in many contexts particularly those involving vulnerability, exposure, or physical intimacy. These include locker rooms and changing facilities, showers and saunas, domestic violence shelters, certain correctional and detention facilities, healthcare environments involving intimate care, and sex segregated accommodations where privacy and personal safety are central to the service provided.

I support policies that:

  • Preserve the right of institutions to maintain women only facilities and services when justified by privacy, safety, or therapeutic need
  • Protect sex based privacy in high sensitivity environments where women and girls are most vulnerable
  • Provide reasonable accommodations such as single occupancy or private use spaces  that ensure all individuals have dignified options without compromising protections for women

Federal Action and Legislative Commitment

Many relevant rules are set at the state and local level, but Congress retains clear authority in areas involving civil rights enforcement, federal funding, and national policy consistency. That authority must be used.

If elected to Congress, I will:

  • Advance clear federal guidance reaffirming Title IX protections for women's sports and reducing the legal uncertainty that currently leaves educational institutions without direction
  • Support legislation that explicitly upholds sex based privacy in contexts where safety and security are paramount
  • Require transparency, public accountability, and measurable outcomes in any federal policy changes affecting sex segregated contexts
  • Defend open discourse and free expression so that parents, educators, and athletes can voice their perspectives without fear of professional retaliation or social punishment

Commitment to Clarity, Fairness, and Dignity

This issue should not be weaponized for partisan gain. Protecting women and girls requires a balanced, constructive approach one anchored in factual standards, legal clarity, and human dignity.

We can restore confidence and fairness by establishing policies that are clear, predictable, and consistent across jurisdictions by preserving the integrity and meaning of female athletic categories; by upholding privacy and safety in sensitive, sex-specific environments; and by providing reasonable, respectful solutions that balance competing rights and acknowledge biological realities.

That is the standard of leadership and common sense policy I intend to bring to Congress.


On Representative DelBene's Record

Representative Suzan DelBene voted against the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025 (H.R. 28) on January 14, 2025. The bill, which aimed to prohibit schools from allowing individuals whose biological sex at birth was male to participate in athletic programs designated for women or girls, passed the House by a vote of 219 to 203. Representative DelBene voted no.

She is also a cosponsor of the Transgender Bill of Rights, a House resolution outlining a set of policy and legislative goals one of which explicitly seeks to amend Title IX in order to prevent the exclusion of biological males from female athletic competition.

In the fight to protect girls' sports, Representative DelBene has clearly stated whose side she is on. It is not the side of the girls and women whose opportunities, records, and safety are at stake.

Representative DelBene has never stood up to protect women's and girls' sports. She has not done so in over twelve years in Congress, and the record makes clear she has no intention of starting now. She will not stand with you on this issue.

And it is worth remembering that Representative DelBene is not just any member of Congress. She holds one of the top leadership positions in the Democratic Party. As Chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee . The organization responsible for developing and coordinating the party's strategy to win House elections , she bore direct responsibility for the outcome of the last election cycle. Under her leadership, Donald Trump became President again. Republicans won control of both the White House and Congress. So the question that every Democrat and every independent voter in this district deserves to ask is a simple one: how is her strategy working out for you so far?

Kincaid will always stand up to protect girls' and women's sports. Kincaid will always stand by you.


Related Links


Kincaid is a moderate, common-sense Democrat and official candidate for Congress in Washington's 1st Congressional District. The campaign is focused on practical solutions for public safety, healthcare, economic fairness, and the protection of women's rights.

Paid for by Kincaid for Congress.











Comments

Popular Posts

Nurse Assault Prevention and Accountability Act of 2027

Nurse Assault Prevention and Accountability Act of 2027 Protecting the People Who Take Care of Us Overview Protecting the People Who Protect Us Every day across America, nurses, certified nursing assistants (CNAs), and frontline healthcare workers walk into hospitals, clinics, and long term care facilities not knowing whether they will be respected or threatened spat on, shoved, or worse. They are not asking for praise. They are asking for protection. According to recent data, nearly three out of four workplace violence incidents in the private sector occur in healthcare settings. Seventy five percent. Nurses are punched. CNAs are attacked. Emergency room staff are threatened not just during pandemics, but during routine shifts in everyday hospitals, in everyday America. And yet, in many states, if someone assaults a nurse throws a punch, delivers a slap, or spits in their face  there may be no serious consequences whatsoever. In too many places, it is treated as a minor m...

Kincaid’s statement on Microsoft job cuts

A Few Words on the Recent Microsoft Job Cuts Back in the old days, if you spoke out against a major employer, people would warn you: "Be careful  this is a company town." Well, Washington State today is essentially a company state. Taking on Microsoft directly would be political suicide for most. Let me be clear: I am not attacking Microsoft, and I am not looking to start a fight with them. But I do think some of their decisions deserve a closer look. Stock Buybacks vs. Real Investment Over the past ten years, Microsoft has spent roughly $170 billion on stock buybacks. That practice is not unusual among large corporations, but it raises a fair question. Instead of artificially inflating its own share price, could some of that money have been put to better use . Invested in people, in innovation, and in the communities that made Microsoft what it is today? Re-examining the H-1B Visa Program We should also take a hard look at the H-1B visa program. Companies claim...

Kincaid's statement on Olympus Spa " Olympus Spa Is the Hill I'm Willing to Die On "

Let's Save Olympus Spa I was genuinely shocked when I learned what happened to Olympus Spa in Lynnwood. I kept asking myself. How? Why? How is something like this even possible in America? At first, I assumed this would never hold up in court. I thought there was no way the people of Washington had voted for this. And I was right they didn't. The voters never decided this. The state legislature did. They passed a law declaring that a biological male including one with male genitalia could be legally recognized as a woman by the state. A new driver's license. A new legal designation. And then the state turned to places like Olympus Spa a women only business where patrons are nude  and said: "You must let him in. Or we will sue you." It did not matter that female customers were deeply uncomfortable being unclothed around biological males. It did not matter that this directly violated the sincere religious beliefs of a Korean owned women's spa. It did n...

Kincaid’s Strategy to End Homelessness

Three Crises, Three Solutions: A New Approach to Homelessness Current homelessness policy has failed. It is time for an honest, structured, and compassionate response . One that matches the cause to the cure. "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." By that definition, the way America deals with homelessness is insanity. Turning the streets into the new asylums is insanity. Allowing people to set up drug dens on the sidewalk is insanity. Allowing people with severe mental illness to live on the sidewalk is insanity. An elderly woman lost her eye because of this insanity. Many innocent people have been killed because of this insanity. Almost daily, we encounter people showing signs of mental illness or who are under the influence of drugs on the streets, on buses, on trains. This is obviously a threat to public safety. It is insanity. It is not compassion for the homeless. It is not compassion for the elde...

Proposal: No Federal Income Tax for Persons Earning $61,000 or Less

No Federal Income Tax or Tax Filing for People Earning $61,000 or Less Summary This proposal would eliminate federal individual income tax liability for people earning $61,000 or less in total wage income, simplifying the tax system for tens of millions of working Americans while having minimal impact on federal revenue. In practical terms, anyone earning approximately $29.33 per hour or less would pay zero federal income tax and would no longer be required to file a tax return each year. Payroll taxes  Social Security and Medicare would still be deducted from paychecks as they are today. Beyond that, nothing. No additional federal tax withheld. No annual filing requirement. Rationale Based on IRS data from the past decade (2013–2022), households earning $61,000 or less make up approximately 50 to 60 percent of all U.S. tax filers. Yet this group contributes only 2 to 3 percent of all federal individual income tax revenue roughly $53 to $79 billion per year, depending o...

The Tragic Failure Behind the Lawrence Reed / Bethany MaGee Case

The System Failed And an Innocent Woman Paid the Price The Tragic Case of Bethany McGee, Lawrence Reed, and Why We Must Reform Civil Commitment Laws When violent repeat offenders are allowed to roam freely despite decades of documented warning signs, innocent people are left playing Russian roulette simply by going about their daily lives. We must bring back long term psychiatric care. We must reform civil commitment laws. And we must stop pretending that what we are doing is working. Just months after Iryna Zarutska was randomly stabbed in the neck and killed on a train in North Carolina, another senseless attack occurred  this time on a train in Chicago. On November 17, 2025, Bethany McGee, a 26-year-old woman, was riding the CTA Blue Line when a man named Lawrence Reed poured gasoline on her and set her on fire. She was left fighting for her life. As horrifying as this attack was, it should not have come as a surprise. It was the predictable result of a system that had i...

KINCAID Exploratory Committee

Updated April 2026 Today, I am announcing my candidacy for Congress in Washington's 1st Congressional District. I have filed official candidacy paperwork with the Federal Election Commission. I am a Democrat challenging fellow Democrat Representative Suzan DelBene, who has held this seat for more than 12 years. State filing will be completed during Washington State's filing period of May 4 - 8, 2026. Washington State ranks among the worst states in the nation for retirees  largely due to the cost of living. But affordability is unlikely to be a personal concern for Representative DelBene. Like so many career politicians, her personal wealth has grown dramatically during her time in office. According to Quiver Quantitative, her net worth has more than doubled since she was first elected  from $60 million to an estimated $141.5 million. That may sound extraordinary, but it is not unusual. More than half of all members of Congress are millionaires. I am not criticizing anyo...

Kincaid’s Statement on Antisemitic Attack Against Jewish Student in Seattle

What happened to a 15-year-old Jewish girl at Nathan Hale High School in Seattle is not just deeply disturbing. It is a case study in how antisemitism spreads when institutions fail to confront it  and in how that failure, left unchecked, produces something genuinely terrifying. This is racism. This is hate. This is evil. And the response from the school system made it worse. I call upon the Mayor of Seattle, the Governor of Washington, the State Attorney General, and all city, state, and federal representatives to condemn this attack without hesitation. I urge them to fully investigate every student and staff member involved  and to offer their unwavering support to the victim and her family. The people of Seattle and the entire state of Washington should be horrified that this happened. We should be embarrassed. We should be ashamed. There is an infection of evil spreading in our country, and this case is one of the most chilling symptoms. I fear what the students ...

Kincaid’s Gun Control Policy

Gun Safety That Works: Stopping Gun Theft Before It Happens There is a significant gap in the national debate on gun control policy. The overwhelming focus has been on laws that do little or nothing to protect people from the daily street crime happening in communities across the country. Far too little attention has been paid to stolen handguns  and to preventing guns from being stolen in the first place. Home invasions and vehicle thefts happen every day, and in many cases they result in firearms being stolen. A criminal should not be able to smash a car window and walk away with a bag full of guns in a matter of minutes. Yet right now, in most of America, that is exactly what can happen  with minimal consequence for anyone. Only 16 states and the District of Columbia require gun owners to report a lost or stolen firearm. Think about that for a moment. There is no federal law requiring the secure storage of guns. A child safety lock may be included with a firearm purch...

Statement from Kincaid: To the people of Bellevue’s Eastgate neighborhood regarding the homeless shelters

Understanding the Problem Before we can solve this problem, it is important to understand how it originated. Did the people of Bellevue want, ask for, or vote for homeless shelters in Eastgate? So how did this happen? A small ruling class a group of people who believe they are superior to everyone else made this decision. King County, Bellevue, Kirkland, and Redmond came together and reached an agreement to move forward with these shelters. It is important to note that this agreement was not legally binding . Bellevue was under no legal obligation to participate. The agreement called for Bellevue, Kirkland, and Redmond to host homeless facilities operated by Plymouth Housing and it did not matter what residents had to say. The facilities were going to be built regardless. The public hearings and the Bellevue City Council vote were little more than formalities. There was very strong opposition to the Eastgate location, and that opposition was ignored. To the People of Eastgate a...