Let’s save Olympus Spa.
I was truly shocked when I learned about the injustice that happened to Olympus Spa in Lynnwood. Honestly. I kept thinking WTF over and over again. Why? How? How is something like this even possible?
At first, I thought this insanity would never hold up in court. I thought, “No way the people of Washington voted for this.” And I was right they didn’t. The voters didn’t decide this. The state legislature did.
They passed a law saying that a biological man yes, even a man with male genitalia could put on a wig and a dress, and the state would declare him legally a woman. They would give him a new driver’s license with an “F” on it. And then they’d turn to places like Olympus Spa, a women-only business where patrons are nude, and say:
“You have to let him in. Or we’ll sue you.”
It didn’t matter that female customers were uncomfortable being naked around men.
It didn’t matter that this violated the Christian beliefs of a Korean-owned women’s spa.
It didn’t matter that this could hurt their business or drive them out of existence.
Their beliefs didn’t matter. Their privacy didn’t matter. Their survival didn’t matter.
What the state legislature did makes no damn sense.
And when the courts upheld it saying Olympus Spa had no right to say no that was my breaking point.
This insanity is one of the reasons Donald Trump won. And it’s one of the reasons I’m seriously considering running for Congress in 2026. It feels like the Democratic Party is trying to push people away on purpose — trying to drive moderates and working-class people into the arms of the Republican Party.
Now maybe the legislators who supported this law had good intentions. I’ll give them that. But as the old saying goes: the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Let’s be clear: if some Democrats want to keep pushing the line that “a man is a woman if he feels like one”, fine. Go ahead.
But in a place like Olympus Spa where women are naked and vulnerable the rule should be simple:
“No one with a penis is allowed.”
This isn’t about hate. This isn’t about denying anyone’s identity.
It’s about common sense, consent, and protecting women’s dignity.
Olympus Spa was an awakening moment for me. I always thought this kind of gender ideology was stupid but I never thought it would go this far. I never thought they would use the full power of the state to force women to strip naked next to a man.
Olympus Spa is the hill I’m willing to die on.
This is the line in the sand.
This is where we make a stand for reason, for rights, and for reality.
-
“If you agree, join me. If you disagree fine but don’t expect women to stay silent.”
-
“This is how we lose elections by ignoring reality. Let’s fix it before it’s too late.”
-
“Let’s save Olympus Spa and restore the right to say no.”
The current law as it stands now. Puts women in danger. In California a man went to prison. Then said he identified as female. He was then sent to a women’s prison. Where he sexually assaulted a female inmate . The same thing happened in Washington. A former inmate at the Washington Corrections Center for Women (WCCW) in Gig Harbor has filed a lawsuit against the Washington Department of Corrections, alleging sexual harassment and constitutional violations while she was incarcerated. Mozzy Clark, the plaintiff, claims that WCCW staff placed her in a cell with a “biological male” inmate, identified as C.W., who was transferred from a men’s prison after declaring a gender identity change. According to the lawsuit, C.W., who is 6′4″ and a convicted sex offender, subjected Clark to repeated harassment and sexual assault.
In addition to appealing the court's decision . Below are options Olympus Spa should also try.
📄 1. Bill Draft (Washington State Legislative)
TITLE:
An Act Relating to Preserving the Privacy and Safety of Intimate Services; Adding a New Section to Chapter 49.60 RCW.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION.
A new section is added to chapter 49.60 RCW to read as follows:
(1) Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter, a place of public accommodation that offers intimate services involving nudity, physical contact, or exposure of private body parts may, in order to protect the privacy, safety, and dignity of its patrons, limit participation in such services to individuals who do not possess genitalia inconsistent with the gender designation of the service provided.
(2) Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit general discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression outside the specific context of intimate services as defined in subsection (1).
(3) “Intimate services” include but are not limited to nude body scrubs, massages, communal bathing, or other services requiring nudity or undressing in shared spaces.
(4) This section shall be construed narrowly to preserve both civil rights and personal dignity in sensitive physical contexts.
🗳️ 2. Ballot Initiative Summary (for 2026 General Election)
Ballot Title (by Secretary of State):
“Initiative Measure No. XXXX concerns privacy in women-only intimate services.”
Ballot Summary:
This measure would allow businesses offering intimate services involving nudity or physical contact to restrict access based on anatomy. Specifically, it permits women-only spas, gyms, or similar establishments to deny access to individuals with male genitalia, even if those individuals identify as female, when such exclusion is necessary to preserve the privacy, safety, or comfort of other patrons. The measure would apply only to intimate settings and would not affect general anti-discrimination protections elsewhere in state law.
Effect if Approved:
Businesses providing women-only intimate services would not be subject to discrimination claims under the Washington Law Against Discrimination for excluding individuals with male genitalia from women-only nude or physically intimate settings.
📢 3. Goal: Protect women's right to privacy, modesty, and safety in vulnerable settings like spas, locker rooms, and bathing facilities.
🔹 Core Message:
-
“This is not about rejecting anyone’s identity it’s about recognizing that intimate spaces involving nudity require special care and boundaries.”
-
“A woman should not be forced to share a nude spa or massage room with someone who has male genitalia just because the law treats them the same on paper.”
-
“Olympus Spa has served women for decades. Let’s protect their right to operate safely and respectfully.”
🔹 Supportive Themes:
-
Privacy: Women deserve spaces where they can be nude or vulnerable without being exposed to male anatomy.
-
Safety: These policies are preventative they help protect patrons from discomfort or abuse, not promote hate.
-
Freedom of Association: Businesses like Olympus Spa should have the right to serve a clientele based on deeply held values and the nature of their services.
-
“This isn’t discrimination it’s distinction, rooted in anatomy and context.”
-
“Would you want your teenage daughter in a communal bath next to an intact adult male? That’s what the court is currently requiring.”
-
“We want to affirm everyone’s dignity but not at the expense of common sense and biological reality in intimate spaces.”
Comments
Post a Comment