Skip to main content

Kincaid’s Strategy to End Homelessness



Three Crises, Three Solutions: A New Approach to Homelessness

Current homelessness policy has failed. It is time for an honest, structured, and compassionate response . One that matches the cause to the cure.

"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." By that definition, the way America deals with homelessness is insanity.

Turning the streets into the new asylums is insanity. Allowing people to set up drug dens on the sidewalk is insanity. Allowing people with severe mental illness to live on the sidewalk is insanity. An elderly woman lost her eye because of this insanity. Many innocent people have been killed because of this insanity. Almost daily, we encounter people showing signs of mental illness or who are under the influence of drugs on the streets, on buses, on trains. This is obviously a threat to public safety. It is insanity. It is not compassion for the homeless. It is not compassion for the elderly woman who lost her eye. It is insanity.


Decades of Failure

For decades, government agencies from HUD to city and county programs have spent billions of dollars to fight homelessness. But despite the money and the promises, the problem keeps getting worse. Why? Because most of our current programs are built on theories that don't work in reality.

In theory, if you have a thousand homeless people, you build a thousand housing units and the problem is solved. In reality, it doesn't work that way.

Some people are struggling with addiction. Others have untreated mental illness. And others simply cannot afford rent in an overpriced market. You cannot put all three groups under one roof and expect stability or safety. People with severe mental illness require specialized care and structure. People in active addiction, without proper treatment, will gravitate toward familiar behaviors that undermine any shared living environment. And for those without addiction or mental illness people facing only financial hardship.  Living alongside these groups without proper support systems would become an unbearable daily struggle.

Case in Point

Look at programs like Plymouth Housing in Bellevue. Their hearts may be in the right place, but the results tell the truth. Police and fire are called there constantly for overdoses, assaults, and mental health crises. It is not compassion to ignore that. It is negligence.


A New Approach: Separate by Cause, Not Convenience

We need a new approach one that separates by cause, not by convenience.

For those struggling with addiction, we need long term, secure rehabilitation centers, isolated from drug access, where recovery takes months, not days. After that, we can transition them into supportive housing where they continue to receive treatment and counseling.

For those with severe mental illness, we need permanent care facilities again. Decades ago, the government shut them all down. Now our streets have become the new institutions. Yes, the old system was broken and inhumane but today, we have the technology, transparency, and public oversight to do it right. Every facility should be subject to regular inspections, not just by government, but by the media, religious organizations, and community volunteers. When care falls short, the public will know immediately.

For those who are simply down on their luck, we can provide short term housing, job training, and rent support for up to a year, with the goal of getting them back into the workforce and off government dependency.


Three Crises. Three Responses.

Homelessness is not one problem with one solution. It is three separate crises that require three separate responses. Addiction, mental illness, and economic hardship. If we face each one honestly with compassion and accountability. We  can begin to rebuild lives, restore safety, and reclaim our public spaces.

That is the future I am fighting for. One where compassion is real, accountability is firm, and taxpayers finally see results.


The Human Cost of Inaction

Case Study: The Iryna Zarutska Tragedy

Consider the case of Decarlos Brown Jr., who stabbed and killed Iryna Zarutska on a train in North Carolina. He had a long history of mental illness, a lengthy criminal record, and was homeless at the time of the attack. Instead of allowing dangerous individuals with severe psychiatric conditions to remain on the streets, the legislation I am proposing would place them in appropriate psychiatric facilities with proper care, oversight, and treatment. This is the responsible path forward. Trump is calling for the death penalty for Decarlos Brown. My legislation would have saved two lives.

This strategy protects public safety. It protects people from being randomly attacked. But it also protects the homeless themselves. Every day across America, many homeless women with mental illness are sexually assaulted, repeatedly and systematically. These crimes often go unreported because the victims are unable to report them. This is not simply a matter of isolated attacks in many cases, it involves organized criminal networks and human trafficking, in which these women are exploited over and over again.

We cannot call ourselves a compassionate society while leaving the most vulnerable among us to suffer and die on the streets.

"The true measure of any society can be found in how it treats its most vulnerable members." — Mahatma Gandhi

  

Link-Streets are the new asylums



The Homeless Recovery and Rehabilitation Act (HRRA)

Rough draft of legislation 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE

This Act may be cited as the “Homeless Recovery and Rehabilitation Act of 2027.”

SECTION 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE

(a) Congressional Findings 

Congress finds that:

1. Federal, state, and local homelessness programs have failed to produce measurable reductions in homelessness despite unprecedented funding.

2. The current “housing-first” model does not adequately address addiction and severe mental illness, which together account for a majority of chronic homelessness.

3. Reestablishing secure, medically supervised treatment and mental health facilities operating under modern oversight can restore lives and reduce community harm.

4. Compassion and accountability are not mutually exclusive they are both essential to achieving lasting recovery.


(b) Purpose 

The purpose of this Act is to:

1. Classify homelessness by primary cause addiction, mental illness, or economic hardship.

2. Create a national framework for treatment based recovery programs.

3. Establish standards for long term mental health and rehabilitation facilities.

4. Require transparency, inspection, and performance based funding for all homelessness programs receiving federal funds.

SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS


For the purposes of this Act:

“Rehabilitation Campus” means a secure, long term residential facility designed to treat substance addiction for a period of 9–12 months or longer.

“Mental Health Care Facility” means a licensed, long term treatment facility for individuals with severe or chronic mental illness who cannot safely live independently.

“Economic Assistance Program” means a short term housing or rental assistance program designed to restore financial stability and workforce participation.

“Qualified Oversight Entity” means an organization approved by HUD and HHS that includes representatives from media, religious, and community organizations.

SECTION 4. SEPARATION BY CAUSE

(a) Classification Requirement — All federal homelessness programs shall categorize participants by primary cause at intake (addiction, mental illness, or economic hardship) for appropriate placement.

(b) Facility Placement 

Individuals with addiction shall be referred to secure rehabilitation campuses.

Individuals with severe mental illness shall be referred to long term mental health care facilities.

Individuals experiencing economic hardship shall be referred to short term housing and workforce programs.

SECTION 5. REHABILITATION AND MENTAL HEALTH FACILITY STANDARDS

(a) Creation of Facilities 

The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall work with state and local governments to:

1. Reopen or construct modern, humane, federally licensed rehabilitation and mental health facilities.

2. Ensure security, transparency, and public oversight through mandatory quarterly inspections.

3. Require that facilities be located in industrial or low impact zones, not within 1,000 feet of residential neighborhoods or schools.


(b) Oversight 

Each facility shall:

Be inspected at least once every 90 days by a Qualified Oversight Entity.

Publish results of inspections and outcomes (overdose rates, employment placement, relapse rates, etc.) on a public dashboard.

SECTION 6. FUNDING AND PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY

(a) Funding Sources 

Reallocate a portion of existing HUD Continuum of Care and HHS block grant funds to support qualified facilities and programs.


(b) Performance-Based Funding 

Federal funding shall be contingent upon measurable outcomes, including:

1. Reduction in relapse or overdose rates.

2. Increase in successful program completions and employment placements.

3. Reduction in repeat homelessness.


(c) Matching Grants 

States that construct or operate compliant facilities shall be eligible for a 75% federal cost match for facility construction and operation.

SECTION 7. NATIONAL HOMELESS OVERSIGHT BOARD

(a) Establishment 

There is hereby established the National Homeless Oversight Board (NHOB) within HUD.

(b) Membership 

The Board shall include:

1. Representatives from HUD, HHS, and DOJ.

2. At least three members from public charities, religious organizations, or nonprofit treatment providers.

3. Two members representing law enforcement and emergency services.

(c) Duties 

The Board shall:


Monitor compliance with facility standards.

Maintain the national performance dashboard.

Recommend funding adjustments based on verified results.

SECTION 8. PROHIBITIONS

No federal funds shall be used to support facilities or programs that:

1. Allow ongoing illegal drug use without mandatory treatment.

2. Fail to meet quarterly inspection or reporting requirements.

3. Fail to provide secure access control, medical supervision, and on site counseling.


SECTION 9. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS


There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as necessary to carry out this Act, with initial funding not to exceed $5 billion annually for fiscal years 2027–2031.

SECTION 10. EFFECTIVE DATE


This Act shall take effect 180 days after enactment.


For some of this to happen. The state of Washington and every other state. Would need to change or update their civil commitment laws . Below is a rough draft of what that might look like.



Model State Bill


The State Mental Health Restoration and Oversight Act




SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE


This Act may be cited as the “State Mental Health Restoration and Oversight Act.”




SECTION 2. LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS


The Legislature finds that:

1. The closure of state operated long term mental health hospitals has left thousands of severely mentally ill individuals without adequate care or supervision.

2. Many individuals with chronic, untreated mental illness now live in unsafe conditions on the streets or in jails, creating harm to themselves and the public.

3. Advances in medical treatment, facility design, and public oversight make it possible to provide humane, transparent, and accountable long term care.

4. It is the policy of this State to reestablish secure, medically supervised facilities for those whose conditions make independent living unsafe or impossible.




SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS


For the purposes of this Act:

“Severe Mental Illness” means a chronic or acute psychiatric condition that substantially impairs a person’s ability to provide for their own basic needs or results in repeated endangerment to self or others.

“Long-Term Mental Health Facility” means a licensed and accredited inpatient facility providing continuous care, treatment, and supervision for individuals with severe mental illness.

“Involuntary Commitment” means a judicial order for placement in a long-term facility after due process and medical evaluation.

“Qualified Oversight Entity” means a nonprofit or governmental body authorized by the State Department of Health to conduct inspections and report publicly.




SECTION 4. AUTHORIZATION OF LONG TERM FACILITIES


(a) The State Department of Health, in coordination with the Department of Social and Health Services, is authorized to:

1. Construct, reopen, or license long-term mental health care facilities.

2. Contract with qualified nonprofit or private operators that meet all licensing and oversight requirements.

3. Locate such facilities in industrial, medical, or low density zones to minimize community impact.


(b) Each facility must provide:

24-hour medical and psychiatric care.

Secure access control and on site supervision.

Rehabilitation, occupational, and therapeutic services.

Periodic evaluation for patient progress and potential discharge.




SECTION 5. INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT AND DUE PROCESS


(a) A person may be ordered into long term treatment if:

1. Two licensed psychiatrists or psychologists certify that the person suffers from severe mental illness and cannot safely live independently, or poses a recurring danger to self or others.

2. A superior court judge finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that long term treatment is necessary.


(b) Commitment orders shall be reviewed:

Every 6 months for medical reassessment.

Every 12 months for judicial review of continued placement.


(c) Patients shall have the right to legal representation, medical review, and family visitation.




SECTION 6. OVERSIGHT AND TRANSPARENCY

1. Every facility shall be inspected at least once every 90 days by a Qualified Oversight Entity.

2. Inspection reports shall be publicly available online within 30 days.

3. Oversight entities may include representatives from health departments, licensed nonprofits, religious charities, and local news media.

4. Abuse or neglect shall be immediately reported to the Attorney General and made public within 72 hours.




SECTION 7. FUNDING

1. The State may receive federal funds under the Homeless Recovery and Rehabilitation Act (HRRA) or other federal programs to construct and operate such facilities.

2. Facilities shall be eligible for up to 75% federal cost matching.

3. The Legislature may appropriate additional funds for staffing, medical supplies, and transportation.




SECTION 8. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS


The Department of Health shall submit an annual report to the Governor and Legislature detailing:

Number of individuals served.

Recovery outcomes and discharge rates.

Complaints, violations, and corrective actions.

Fiscal expenditures and cost per patient.




SECTION 9. SEVERABILITY


If any provision of this Act is held invalid, the remaining sections shall remain in effect.




SECTION 10. EFFECTIVE DATE


This Act shall take effect 90 days after enactment.














Comments

Popular Posts

Kincaid’s statement on Microsoft job cuts

A Few Words on the Recent Microsoft Job Cuts Back in the old days, if you spoke out against a major employer, people would warn you: "Be careful  this is a company town." Well, Washington State today is essentially a company state. Taking on Microsoft directly would be political suicide for most. Let me be clear: I am not attacking Microsoft, and I am not looking to start a fight with them. But I do think some of their decisions deserve a closer look. Stock Buybacks vs. Real Investment Over the past ten years, Microsoft has spent roughly $170 billion on stock buybacks. That practice is not unusual among large corporations, but it raises a fair question. Instead of artificially inflating its own share price, could some of that money have been put to better use . Invested in people, in innovation, and in the communities that made Microsoft what it is today? Re-examining the H-1B Visa Program We should also take a hard look at the H-1B visa program. Companies claim...

Nurse Assault Prevention and Accountability Act of 2027

Nurse Assault Prevention and Accountability Act of 2027 Protecting the People Who Take Care of Us Overview Protecting the People Who Protect Us Every day across America, nurses, certified nursing assistants (CNAs), and frontline healthcare workers walk into hospitals, clinics, and long term care facilities not knowing whether they will be respected or threatened spat on, shoved, or worse. They are not asking for praise. They are asking for protection. According to recent data, nearly three out of four workplace violence incidents in the private sector occur in healthcare settings. Seventy five percent. Nurses are punched. CNAs are attacked. Emergency room staff are threatened not just during pandemics, but during routine shifts in everyday hospitals, in everyday America. And yet, in many states, if someone assaults a nurse throws a punch, delivers a slap, or spits in their face  there may be no serious consequences whatsoever. In too many places, it is treated as a minor m...

Kincaid's statement on Olympus Spa " Olympus Spa Is the Hill I'm Willing to Die On "

Let's Save Olympus Spa I was genuinely shocked when I learned what happened to Olympus Spa in Lynnwood. I kept asking myself. How? Why? How is something like this even possible in America? At first, I assumed this would never hold up in court. I thought there was no way the people of Washington had voted for this. And I was right they didn't. The voters never decided this. The state legislature did. They passed a law declaring that a biological male including one with male genitalia could be legally recognized as a woman by the state. A new driver's license. A new legal designation. And then the state turned to places like Olympus Spa a women only business where patrons are nude  and said: "You must let him in. Or we will sue you." It did not matter that female customers were deeply uncomfortable being unclothed around biological males. It did not matter that this directly violated the sincere religious beliefs of a Korean owned women's spa. It did n...

Proposal: No Federal Income Tax for Persons Earning $61,000 or Less

No Federal Income Tax or Tax Filing for People Earning $61,000 or Less Summary This proposal would eliminate federal individual income tax liability for people earning $61,000 or less in total wage income, simplifying the tax system for tens of millions of working Americans while having minimal impact on federal revenue. In practical terms, anyone earning approximately $29.33 per hour or less would pay zero federal income tax and would no longer be required to file a tax return each year. Payroll taxes  Social Security and Medicare would still be deducted from paychecks as they are today. Beyond that, nothing. No additional federal tax withheld. No annual filing requirement. Rationale Based on IRS data from the past decade (2013–2022), households earning $61,000 or less make up approximately 50 to 60 percent of all U.S. tax filers. Yet this group contributes only 2 to 3 percent of all federal individual income tax revenue roughly $53 to $79 billion per year, depending o...

The Tragic Failure Behind the Lawrence Reed / Bethany MaGee Case

The System Failed And an Innocent Woman Paid the Price The Tragic Case of Bethany McGee, Lawrence Reed, and Why We Must Reform Civil Commitment Laws When violent repeat offenders are allowed to roam freely despite decades of documented warning signs, innocent people are left playing Russian roulette simply by going about their daily lives. We must bring back long term psychiatric care. We must reform civil commitment laws. And we must stop pretending that what we are doing is working. Just months after Iryna Zarutska was randomly stabbed in the neck and killed on a train in North Carolina, another senseless attack occurred  this time on a train in Chicago. On November 17, 2025, Bethany McGee, a 26-year-old woman, was riding the CTA Blue Line when a man named Lawrence Reed poured gasoline on her and set her on fire. She was left fighting for her life. As horrifying as this attack was, it should not have come as a surprise. It was the predictable result of a system that had i...

KINCAID Exploratory Committee

Announcing an Exploratory Committee for Washington's 1st Congressional District Today, I am announcing the formation of an exploratory committee to pursue a run for Congress in Washington's 1st Congressional District. I am a Democrat. If I run, I will likely be challenging fellow Democrat Representative Suzan DelBene, who has held this seat for more than 12 years. Washington State ranks among the worst states in the nation for retirees largely due to the cost of living. But affordability is unlikely to be a concern for Representative DelBene. Like so many career politicians, her personal wealth has grown dramatically during her time in office. According to Quiver Quantitative, her net worth has more than doubled from $60 million to $126.34 million. That may sound extraordinary, but it is not unusual. More than half of all members of Congress are millionaires. Among the ten wealthiest members of Congress, Representative DelBene currently ranks eighth. Let me be clear. ...

Kincaid’s Gun Control Policy

Gun Safety That Works: Stopping Gun Theft Before It Happens There is a significant gap in the national debate on gun control policy. The overwhelming focus has been on laws that do little or nothing to protect people from the daily street crime happening in communities across the country. Far too little attention has been paid to stolen handguns  and to preventing guns from being stolen in the first place. Home invasions and vehicle thefts happen every day, and in many cases they result in firearms being stolen. A criminal should not be able to smash a car window and walk away with a bag full of guns in a matter of minutes. Yet right now, in most of America, that is exactly what can happen  with minimal consequence for anyone. Only 16 states and the District of Columbia require gun owners to report a lost or stolen firearm. Think about that for a moment. There is no federal law requiring the secure storage of guns. A child safety lock may be included with a firearm purch...

Statement from Kincaid: To the people of Bellevue’s Eastgate neighborhood regarding the homeless shelters

Understanding the Problem Before we can solve this problem, it is important to understand how it originated. Did the people of Bellevue want, ask for, or vote for homeless shelters in Eastgate? So how did this happen? A small ruling class a group of people who believe they are superior to everyone else made this decision. King County, Bellevue, Kirkland, and Redmond came together and reached an agreement to move forward with these shelters. It is important to note that this agreement was not legally binding . Bellevue was under no legal obligation to participate. The agreement called for Bellevue, Kirkland, and Redmond to host homeless facilities operated by Plymouth Housing and it did not matter what residents had to say. The facilities were going to be built regardless. The public hearings and the Bellevue City Council vote were little more than formalities. There was very strong opposition to the Eastgate location, and that opposition was ignored. To the People of Eastgate a...

Kincaid’s Statement on Antisemitic Attack Against Jewish Student in Seattle

This is a deeply disturbing case of antisemitism targeting a 15 year old Jewish girl at her high school in Seattle. This is racism. This is hate. This is evil. What the other students did to her is unconscionable and so is the failure of the school system to protect her. I call upon the Mayor of Seattle, the Governor of Washington, the State Attorney General, and all city, state, and federal representatives to condemn this act without hesitation. I urge them to fully investigate the students and staff involved, and to offer their unwavering support to the victim and her family. The people of Seattle and the entire state of Washington should be horrified that this happened. We should be embarrassed. We should be ashamed. There is an infection of evil spreading in our country, and this case is one of the most chilling symptoms. I fear what the students who committed this act may be capable of as adults if this hatred is  left unchecked. Case Outline : Antisemitism at Nathan H...