Skip to main content

Proposal: No Federal Income Tax for Persons Earning $61,000 or Less




No Federal Income Tax or Tax Filing for People Earning $61,000 or Less

Summary

This proposal would eliminate federal individual income tax liability for people earning $61,000 or less in total wage income, simplifying the tax system for tens of millions of working Americans while having minimal impact on federal revenue. In practical terms, anyone earning approximately $29.33 per hour or less would pay zero federal income tax and would no longer be required to file a tax return each year. Payroll taxes  Social Security and Medicare would still be deducted from paychecks as they are today. Beyond that, nothing. No additional federal tax withheld. No annual filing requirement.

Rationale

Based on IRS data from the past decade (2013–2022), households earning $61,000 or less make up approximately 50 to 60 percent of all U.S. tax filers. Yet this group contributes only 2 to 3 percent of all federal individual income tax revenue roughly $53 to $79 billion per year, depending on the year.

To put that figure in perspective it is a rounding error compared to the Department of Defense budget. The DoD has failed to pass a financial audit for many consecutive years and does not expect to pass one until 2028. Every year, the Pentagon is unable to account for between $8 and $10 billion in taxpayer money. Meanwhile, the current budget proposal increases defense spending from $895 billion to $1.045 trillion, while the ICE budget has grown from $10 billion to over $100 billion. The IRS collects between $4 and $5 trillion in total revenue annually. The $53 to $79 billion at stake here represents a small fraction of that total.

It is also worth noting that many people in this income group already pay little or no federal income tax, thanks to the standard deduction and refundable credits like the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit. IRS data from 2021 shows that over 56 million returns had zero federal income tax liability  93 percent of which came from filers earning under $50,000.

Consider this in 12 states, the average teacher salary falls below $61,000. In Mississippi, the average is $53,704. In North Carolina, it is $58,292.

For the millions of Americans in this income range who already pay little to nothing in federal income taxes and who often receive every dollar withheld returned to them as a refund  what is the point of requiring them to file at all? What is the value of the time, money, stress, and administrative overhead spent processing returns that produce no net revenue? There is none. This proposal simply eliminates that waste.

Benefits

1. Simplifies the Tax System

Eliminating the filing requirement for this income group removes an annual burden from tens of millions of low and middle income Americans. It reduces the time, cost, and confusion associated with calculating and submitting federal income tax forms each year, and allows the IRS to focus its resources where they generate actual revenue.

2. Saves Government Resources

The IRS spends significant money processing, auditing, and enforcing returns that ultimately produce no net revenue. Removing these low yield returns from the system reduces administrative overhead and frees enforcement resources for higher income filers and complex returns where audit activity produces a meaningful financial return.

3. Promotes Economic Fairness

People in this income range already contribute to the system through payroll taxes, state and local taxes, and sales taxes. This proposal acknowledges that contribution and allows working class families to keep more of their take home pay money that will go directly toward housing, healthcare, childcare, and other essential needs, not into a tax filing process that benefits no one.

Fiscal Impact

The maximum annual revenue loss under this proposal would be approximately $53 to $79 billion, based on 2022 IRS data. That gap could be closed through any combination of the following approaches:

  • Restoring individual income tax rates on earnings above $400,000 to pre 2017 levels
  • Phasing out loopholes and preferential treatment for capital gains at the highest income levels
  • Modest reductions in inefficient federal programs or targeted defense budget reforms

The revenue offset options are plentiful. The fiscal case for this proposal is sound.

Implementation Framework

Eligibility: The exemption applies to individuals with total wage or salary income of $61,000 or less.

Automatic Exemption: IRS software and W-2 reporting systems would automatically exclude eligible households from income tax liability. No action is required on the part of the taxpayer.

Optional Filing: Taxpayers below the threshold may still file voluntarily if they wish to claim refundable credits or deductions.

Important Notes

This legislation does not eliminate the option to file  it eliminates the requirement. All existing tax credits remain fully intact. This proposal is focused specifically on the federal income tax.

A note for gig workers: if you work as an independent contractor for platforms like Uber or DoorDash, you receive a 1099 rather than a W-2, and you remain responsible for paying the self employment tax, which covers Social Security and Medicare. If you choose to take no deductions, the IRS can calculate your obligation automatically. If you wish to deduct business expenses such as mileage, you may still voluntarily file a return. That option remains available to everyone.

A Note on Pre-Filled Tax Returns

Several countries already use pre-filled tax returns a system in which the government prepares your tax form using data it already has from employers, banks, and other reporting sources, and the taxpayer simply confirms or corrects it. This approach dramatically reduces the burden on individuals and increases overall compliance.

Estonia operates a fully digital tax system in which most taxpayers complete their filing in under five minutes. Sweden sends taxpayers a pre-filled form that roughly 75 percent of filers confirm with no further action required by text, phone, or app. Denmark, Norway, and Finland each operate similar systems with high accuracy rates driven by employer and financial institution data. New Zealand moved to automatic assessment for wage earners in 2019, meaning most taxpayers no longer need to file at all. Spain and Chile have each implemented pre-filled return systems used by millions of taxpayers with strong results.

The United States government already possesses the W-2 and 1099 data necessary to pre-fill returns for most Americans. The primary reason this has not happened is lobbying. For two decades, tax preparation companies including Intuit the maker of TurboTax and H&R Block have spent millions of dollars fighting legislation that would allow the IRS to offer free, pre-filled filing directly to taxpayers. This is not a technological problem. It is a political one.

Related Link: Inside TurboTax's 20-Year Fight to Stop Americans From Filing Their Taxes for Free — ProPublica

Conclusion

This is not a giveaway. It is an efficiency upgrade  a long overdue modernization of a system that no longer reflects how millions of Americans actually live and work. If the government already knows what you earned, and you do not owe anything, why should you be required to jump through hoops every spring to prove it?

Eliminating federal income taxes for people earning $61,000 or less is fiscally responsible, administratively efficient, and economically just. The cost to the federal budget is modest. The benefit to tens of millions of households is real and immediate. This proposal deserves a vote in Congress, and those who vote against it should be prepared to explain to their constituents exactly why.

The math works. This is a fully feasible proposal. Anyone who claims otherwise is either uninformed or being deliberately misleading.

For Republicans who oppose revisiting the 2017 tax cuts, adjusting capital gains treatment, or trimming defense spending that is a legitimate position to hold. But there are hundreds of other ways to recover the $53 to $79 billion. The money is not the obstacle. The real question is whether there are enough members of Congress who genuinely care about hardworking Americans.

Every day, millions of people work full time  or more than full time  and still struggle to get ahead. They are not asking for a handout. They are asking for a system that does not pile unnecessary burdens on top of already difficult lives. Congress must stop talking and start acting. It has spent years discussing the housing crisis without taking meaningful action. It has debated the long term solvency of Social Security and Medicare for decades without delivering real solutions. That pattern must end.

Eliminating federal income tax for those earning $61,000 or less will not make anyone wealthy. But it will help millions of Americans breathe a little easier. It will make daily survival a little less exhausting. And that alone makes it worth doing.

Draft Legislation

Real Tax Reform and Simplification Act of 2027

120th Congress  ·  1st Session  ·  H.R. XXXX

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Kincaid introduced the following bill, which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.

A BILL to eliminate federal income tax liability and filing requirements for individual taxpayers with annual earned income of $61,000 or less, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

Section 1. Short Title

This Act may be cited as the "Real Tax Reform and Simplification Act of 2027."

Section 2. Income Tax Exemption for Individuals Earning $61,000 or Less

(a) In General. Section 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

(j) Exemption for Low Income Earners.

(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, in the case of an individual whose adjusted gross income from wage or salary income does not exceed $61,000 during the taxable year —

(A) no tax shall be imposed under this section, and

(B) such individual shall not be required to file a return under section 6012 unless otherwise required to claim a refundable credit.

(2) This subsection shall apply regardless of filing status or number of dependents.

Section 3. Automatic Filing Exemption Mechanism

(a) Automatic Exemption via Reporting Entities. The Secretary of the Treasury shall establish regulations requiring that all W-2 and 1099 income reporting entities submit income data in a manner that enables the IRS to automatically identify and exclude qualifying individuals from filing requirements under section 6012 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

(b) Voluntary Return Filing. Nothing in this Act shall prevent an eligible taxpayer from voluntarily filing a tax return for the purpose of claiming a refund or any refundable tax credit.

Section 4. Self-Employment Tax Treatment

(a) Individuals with income reported solely via Form 1099 who earn $61,000 or less in a taxable year shall remain subject to the self-employment tax under section 1401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

(b) Such individuals shall not be required to file a federal income tax return unless electing to deduct eligible business expenses or claim refundable credits.

Section 5. Fiscal Offset

To offset any reduction in federal revenue resulting from the provisions of this Act, the following changes shall be enacted:

  • (1) The top marginal individual income tax rate shall revert to the rate in effect prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
  • (2) The preferential tax rate for capital gains income on earnings over $1,000,000 shall be eliminated.

Section 6. Effective Date

This Act shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2027.





Labels:
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Kincaid’s statement on Microsoft job cuts

A Few Words on the Recent Microsoft Job Cuts Back in the old days, if you spoke out against a major employer, people would warn you: "Be careful  this is a company town." Well, Washington State today is essentially a company state. Taking on Microsoft directly would be political suicide for most. Let me be clear: I am not attacking Microsoft, and I am not looking to start a fight with them. But I do think some of their decisions deserve a closer look. Stock Buybacks vs. Real Investment Over the past ten years, Microsoft has spent roughly $170 billion on stock buybacks. That practice is not unusual among large corporations, but it raises a fair question. Instead of artificially inflating its own share price, could some of that money have been put to better use . Invested in people, in innovation, and in the communities that made Microsoft what it is today? Re-examining the H-1B Visa Program We should also take a hard look at the H-1B visa program. Companies claim...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nurse Assault Prevention and Accountability Act of 2027

Nurse Assault Prevention and Accountability Act of 2027 Protecting the People Who Take Care of Us Overview Protecting the People Who Protect Us Every day across America, nurses, certified nursing assistants (CNAs), and frontline healthcare workers walk into hospitals, clinics, and long term care facilities not knowing whether they will be respected or threatened spat on, shoved, or worse. They are not asking for praise. They are asking for protection. According to recent data, nearly three out of four workplace violence incidents in the private sector occur in healthcare settings. Seventy five percent. Nurses are punched. CNAs are attacked. Emergency room staff are threatened not just during pandemics, but during routine shifts in everyday hospitals, in everyday America. And yet, in many states, if someone assaults a nurse throws a punch, delivers a slap, or spits in their face  there may be no serious consequences whatsoever. In too many places, it is treated as a minor m...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kincaid's statement on Olympus Spa " Olympus Spa Is the Hill I'm Willing to Die On "

Let's Save Olympus Spa I was genuinely shocked when I learned what happened to Olympus Spa in Lynnwood. I kept asking myself. How? Why? How is something like this even possible in America? At first, I assumed this would never hold up in court. I thought there was no way the people of Washington had voted for this. And I was right they didn't. The voters never decided this. The state legislature did. They passed a law declaring that a biological male including one with male genitalia could be legally recognized as a woman by the state. A new driver's license. A new legal designation. And then the state turned to places like Olympus Spa a women only business where patrons are nude  and said: "You must let him in. Or we will sue you." It did not matter that female customers were deeply uncomfortable being unclothed around biological males. It did not matter that this directly violated the sincere religious beliefs of a Korean owned women's spa. It did n...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kincaid’s Strategy to End Homelessness

Three Crises, Three Solutions: A New Approach to Homelessness Current homelessness policy has failed. It is time for an honest, structured, and compassionate response . One that matches the cause to the cure. "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." By that definition, the way America deals with homelessness is insanity. Turning the streets into the new asylums is insanity. Allowing people to set up drug dens on the sidewalk is insanity. Allowing people with severe mental illness to live on the sidewalk is insanity. An elderly woman lost her eye because of this insanity. Many innocent people have been killed because of this insanity. Almost daily, we encounter people showing signs of mental illness or who are under the influence of drugs on the streets, on buses, on trains. This is obviously a threat to public safety. It is insanity. It is not compassion for the homeless. It is not compassion for the elde...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Tragic Failure Behind the Lawrence Reed / Bethany MaGee Case

The System Failed And an Innocent Woman Paid the Price The Tragic Case of Bethany McGee, Lawrence Reed, and Why We Must Reform Civil Commitment Laws When violent repeat offenders are allowed to roam freely despite decades of documented warning signs, innocent people are left playing Russian roulette simply by going about their daily lives. We must bring back long term psychiatric care. We must reform civil commitment laws. And we must stop pretending that what we are doing is working. Just months after Iryna Zarutska was randomly stabbed in the neck and killed on a train in North Carolina, another senseless attack occurred  this time on a train in Chicago. On November 17, 2025, Bethany McGee, a 26-year-old woman, was riding the CTA Blue Line when a man named Lawrence Reed poured gasoline on her and set her on fire. She was left fighting for her life. As horrifying as this attack was, it should not have come as a surprise. It was the predictable result of a system that had i...
Post a Comment
Read more

KINCAID Exploratory Committee

Announcing an Exploratory Committee for Washington's 1st Congressional District Today, I am announcing the formation of an exploratory committee to pursue a run for Congress in Washington's 1st Congressional District. I am a Democrat. If I run, I will likely be challenging fellow Democrat Representative Suzan DelBene, who has held this seat for more than 12 years. Washington State ranks among the worst states in the nation for retirees largely due to the cost of living. But affordability is unlikely to be a concern for Representative DelBene. Like so many career politicians, her personal wealth has grown dramatically during her time in office. According to Quiver Quantitative, her net worth has more than doubled from $60 million to $126.34 million. That may sound extraordinary, but it is not unusual. More than half of all members of Congress are millionaires. Among the ten wealthiest members of Congress, Representative DelBene currently ranks eighth. Let me be clear. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kincaid’s Gun Control Policy

Gun Safety That Works: Stopping Gun Theft Before It Happens There is a significant gap in the national debate on gun control policy. The overwhelming focus has been on laws that do little or nothing to protect people from the daily street crime happening in communities across the country. Far too little attention has been paid to stolen handguns  and to preventing guns from being stolen in the first place. Home invasions and vehicle thefts happen every day, and in many cases they result in firearms being stolen. A criminal should not be able to smash a car window and walk away with a bag full of guns in a matter of minutes. Yet right now, in most of America, that is exactly what can happen  with minimal consequence for anyone. Only 16 states and the District of Columbia require gun owners to report a lost or stolen firearm. Think about that for a moment. There is no federal law requiring the secure storage of guns. A child safety lock may be included with a firearm purch...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kincaid’s Statement on Antisemitic Attack Against Jewish Student in Seattle

This is a deeply disturbing case of antisemitism targeting a 15 year old Jewish girl at her high school in Seattle. This is racism. This is hate. This is evil. What the other students did to her is unconscionable and so is the failure of the school system to protect her. I call upon the Mayor of Seattle, the Governor of Washington, the State Attorney General, and all city, state, and federal representatives to condemn this act without hesitation. I urge them to fully investigate the students and staff involved, and to offer their unwavering support to the victim and her family. The people of Seattle and the entire state of Washington should be horrified that this happened. We should be embarrassed. We should be ashamed. There is an infection of evil spreading in our country, and this case is one of the most chilling symptoms. I fear what the students who committed this act may be capable of as adults if this hatred is  left unchecked. Case Outline : Antisemitism at Nathan H...
Post a Comment
Read more

Statement from Kincaid: To the people of Bellevue’s Eastgate neighborhood regarding the homeless shelters

Understanding the Problem Before we can solve this problem, it is important to understand how it originated. Did the people of Bellevue want, ask for, or vote for homeless shelters in Eastgate? So how did this happen? A small ruling class a group of people who believe they are superior to everyone else made this decision. King County, Bellevue, Kirkland, and Redmond came together and reached an agreement to move forward with these shelters. It is important to note that this agreement was not legally binding . Bellevue was under no legal obligation to participate. The agreement called for Bellevue, Kirkland, and Redmond to host homeless facilities operated by Plymouth Housing and it did not matter what residents had to say. The facilities were going to be built regardless. The public hearings and the Bellevue City Council vote were little more than formalities. There was very strong opposition to the Eastgate location, and that opposition was ignored. To the People of Eastgate a...
Post a Comment
Read more