Skip to main content

White House Office to Combat Antisemitism

Kincaid for Congress


Proposal for the Creation of a White House Office to Combat Antisemitism

June 14, 2025  ·  By Kincaid

Jewish Americans are facing harassment, vandalism, intimidation, and violence  and too often the government's response is fragmented, slow, and invisible to the public. Despite the documented rise of antisemitism in the United States and around the world, there is no permanent White House office solely dedicated to confronting this growing threat. While agencies like the State Department and the Domestic Policy Council play supporting roles, their efforts are disconnected, reactive, and largely unknown to most Americans.

We need a permanent, visible, high level response. That is why I am proposing the creation of a White House Office to Combat Antisemitism, housed within the Executive Office of the President.

This office would serve as the center of gravity for federal coordination  setting national priorities, aligning agency efforts, measuring results, and ensuring the federal government responds to antisemitism with speed, seriousness, and accountability.


Why This Office Is Needed

Antisemitism is not only a threat to Jewish people. It is a threat to the rule of law, to civil rights, and to national security. FBI data consistently shows that Jewish Americans are the most targeted religious group in hate crime statistics year after year. Antisemitism is rising on college campuses, spreading across online platforms, and deepening inside extremist movements. Yet no single office currently has the authority, the visibility, or the permanence to drive a comprehensive federal response.

Other national priorities  drug policy, pandemic preparedness, cybersecurity have long had dedicated White House offices to coordinate the government's response. Antisemitism deserves no less.

Right now, responsibility is scattered across many agencies: the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, the Department of Education, the Department of Health and Human Services, the State Department, and others. Each plays a role. But without a strong coordinating center inside the White House, the federal response remains fragmented, inconsistent, reactive, and largely invisible to the American public.

A White House office makes the issue impossible to ignore. It gives the federal government a single, authoritative place to set strategy, coordinate action, and be held accountable for results.


Mission

The White House Office to Combat Antisemitism would:

  • Coordinate federal policy and operations across all relevant agencies
  • Track antisemitic incidents and threats using consistent national metrics
  • Support prevention through education, community partnerships, and targeted training
  • Strengthen enforcement against violence, threats, and unlawful discrimination
  • Publish transparent, public facing reporting so Americans can see both progress and gaps

What the Office Would Actually Do

This would be an operational coordinating office inside the Executive Office of the President  with real responsibilities and measurable outputs.

1. Interagency Coordination and Rapid Response

  • Establish an interagency working group with senior designees from the DOJ, FBI, DHS, Department of Education, HHS, and State Department
  • Create a rapid response protocol for major incidents involving threats, violence, or coordinated harassment
  • Ensure the White House can immediately mobilize resources when Jewish communities are targeted

2. Enforcement and Civil Rights Implementation

  • Coordinate DOJ and FBI support for investigations where conduct crosses into credible threats, criminal harassment, vandalism, or violence
  • Work with the Department of Education's civil rights enforcement division when antisemitism constitutes illegal discrimination in schools and universities
  • Promote consistent guidance and training for federal, state, and local partners

3. Online Hate, Threats, and Propaganda

The government cannot  and should not police constitutionally protected speech. But it can and should do the following:

  • Convene major online platforms and establish faster response channels for credible threats
  • Push for transparency metrics: response times, enforcement of existing platform policies, and reporting consistency
  • Coordinate referrals when content crosses into unlawful conduct threats, harassment, stalking, and coordinated intimidation

This approach is both legally durable and operationally serious. It focuses on safety, transparency, and enforcement  not censorship.

4. Prevention and Public Education

  • Fund and coordinate evidence based antisemitism prevention programs
  • Expand training for schools and institutions on recognizing antisemitism and responding effectively
  • Work with communities to strengthen security where needed, consistent with civil liberties protections

5. Public Reporting and Accountability

  • Publish an annual report on antisemitism trends and the status of federal action
  • Maintain a public facing dashboard of federal initiatives, programs, and measurable progress

Structure and Leadership

Location: The office would be housed within the Executive Office of the President, reporting directly to senior White House leadership.

Leadership: Led by a Director with direct access to the President's senior staff, supported by a professional team covering policy, data and analytics, interagency coordination, communications, and community engagement.

Advisory Council: A bipartisan advisory council would include:

  • Jewish community leaders across denominations
  • Civil rights experts
  • Law enforcement and security professionals
  • Education leaders
  • Civil liberties representatives to ensure appropriate guardrails

Deliverables and Timeline

This office should be judged by what it actually delivers  not by its existence.

  • Within 90 days: Interagency operating plan, designated agency liaisons, and a national metrics framework
  • Within 180 days: Federal guidance package for educational institutions and a best practices toolkit for communities
  • Within 12 months: First annual report, public dashboard, and measurable performance targets for year two

Budget and Staffing

  • Estimated annual budget: $8–12 million
  • Estimated staffing: 20 full time staff

This is a modest investment for a major national priority and far less costly than allowing hate driven threats and violence to go unchecked and unchallenged.


Precedent and Why This Can Happen Now

The federal government has created high-level White House coordinating offices before when the stakes demanded it offices designed to align agencies, enforce strategy, and deliver results. Antisemitism and hate driven violence deserve that same level of seriousness and commitment.

Two pieces of legislation already address this need: H.R. 6806, the Antisemitism Response and Prevention Act of 2025, and S. 4091, the Countering Antisemitism Act. Both call for the creation of a National Coordinator to Combat Antisemitism. Both have stalled in Congress and may never pass.

My proposal does not depend on Congress. A White House Office to Combat Antisemitism can be established by executive action  it can happen now. Jewish Americans cannot afford to wait indefinitely for legislation that may never move.

In January 2025, the Justice Department announced the formation of a multi agency Task Force to Combat Antisemitism. That effort is meaningful, but it is not the same as a permanent institutional office. Because it was not created by statute, it can be modified or shut down through administrative action at any time.

There are two ways to establish this office permanently:

  • By statute (Congressional law): More durable  can define authorities and reporting requirements in law
  • By executive action: Faster to launch, but subject to reversal by future administrations

I support making this office permanent through legislation, so the federal government's commitment does not evaporate with the next news cycle or the next election.


Who Should Lead This Office

I have three candidates in mind for Director: Shai Albrecht, Noa Tishby, and Elizabeth Savetsky. My first choice is Shai Albrecht.

No disrespect is intended toward the current U.S. Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism or the White House Jewish Liaison. But the reality is that most Americans outside the Jewish community have never heard of them or their offices. That is not a reflection on those individuals  it is a reflection of how invisible the fight against antisemitism has become in the halls of power.

More is needed. It is needed now. We need a far more visible office with a far more visible leader  someone with the reach and the credibility to speak not just to the Jewish community, but to every American.


A Note on Security

Unfortunately, whoever is chosen to lead the White House Office to Combat Antisemitism will need immediate, round the clock protection for themselves and their immediate family  ideally at the level of Secret Service protection.

The visibility and mission of this role will make its Director a target. That reality must be planned for from day one, not addressed after an incident occurs. The federal government has an obligation to protect those it asks to stand on the front lines of this fight.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​


A Personal Word

"Antisemitism is not just a threat to Jews. It is a threat to national security. It is a threat to the very principles that are the foundation of America. When I see what is happening to Jewish people, it breaks my heart. This should not be happening anywhere in the world. But to see it happening in America should make every American bow their head in shame."

— Kincaid


Related Links


Kincaid is a moderate, common sense Democrat and official candidate for Congress in Washington's 1st Congressional District, running to deliver practical solutions on public safety, healthcare, homelessness, and accountable government.

Draft Legislation

White House Office to Combat Antisemitism Act of 2027

120th Congress  ·  1st Session  ·  H.R. ____

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Mr. Kincaid of Washington introduced the following bill, which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary and, in addition, to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

A BILL to establish the White House Office to Combat Antisemitism within the Executive Office of the President, to designate a Director, to require interagency collaboration, public reporting, and measurable accountability, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

Section 1. Short Title

This Act may be cited as the "White House Office to Combat Antisemitism Act of 2027" or the "WHOCA Act of 2027."

Section 2. Findings

Congress finds the following:

  • Antisemitism is not merely a threat to Jewish Americans. It is a threat to the rule of law, civil rights, national security, and the democratic principles upon which the United States was founded.
  • FBI hate crime data consistently identifies Jewish Americans as the most frequently targeted religious group in the United States, year after year.
  • Antisemitic incidents are rising on college campuses, proliferating across online platforms, and accelerating within domestic extremist movements.
  • The federal government's current response to antisemitism is fragmented across multiple agencies without a central coordinating authority.
  • The absence of a permanent, high-visibility coordinating office within the Executive Office of the President results in a response that is reactive, inconsistent, and largely invisible to the American public.
  • Other national priorities  including drug policy, pandemic preparedness, and cybersecurity  have long been served by dedicated White House coordinating offices. Combating antisemitism warrants the same level of institutional commitment.
  • Existing legislative proposals, including H.R. 6806 and S. 4091, have stalled in Congress. A permanent office established by statute provides durability and accountability that executive action alone cannot guarantee.
  • The White House Jewish Liaison serves a distinct and vital function as a relationship and community engagement office. That office should remain independent, while being required to coordinate formally with the Office established by this Act.

Section 3. Establishment of the White House Office to Combat Antisemitism

(a) Establishment. There is established within the Executive Office of the President an office to be known as the "White House Office to Combat Antisemitism" (referred to in this Act as the "Office").

(b) Purpose. The purpose of the Office is to serve as the central coordinating authority for all federal efforts to identify, prevent, and respond to antisemitism in the United States, and to ensure that those efforts are visible, measurable, consistent, and accountable to the American public.

(c) Location. The Office shall be housed within the Executive Office of the President and shall report directly to senior White House leadership.

Section 4. Director of the Office

(a) Appointment. The Office shall be led by a Director, appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(b) Qualifications. The Director shall have demonstrated expertise in civil rights, law enforcement, national security, or community leadership, and shall have the public profile and credibility necessary to advance the Office's mission with both the Jewish community and the broader American public.

(c) Duties. The Director shall serve as the principal federal official responsible for coordinating government wide efforts to combat antisemitism; report directly to the President or a senior designee; chair the Interagency Working Group established under Section 6; oversee development of a National Strategy to Combat Antisemitism updated not less than every two years; submit annual reports to Congress; and maintain regular formal coordination with the White House Jewish Liaison as provided in Section 5.

(d) Compensation. The Director shall be compensated at a rate not to exceed Level II of the Executive Schedule under section 5313 of title 5, United States Code.

Section 5. Relationship to the White House Jewish Liaison

(a) Preservation. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to abolish, subordinate, or diminish the role of the White House Jewish Liaison. The Liaison shall continue to serve as the principal point of contact between the President and the American Jewish community and shall retain its existing functions and reporting structure.

(b) Formal Coordination Requirement. The Director and the White House Jewish Liaison shall establish a formal coordination protocol within 60 days of the Director's confirmation, ensuring regular communication not less than monthly, coordination on community engagement and outreach, collaboration on public communications, and a clear delineation of roles  enforcement and coordination with the Office; community relationships with the Liaison.

(c) Joint Reporting. The Director and the White House Jewish Liaison shall submit a joint section in the annual report required under Section 9, describing the coordination activities of both offices during the prior year.

Section 6. Interagency Working Group on Antisemitism

(a) Establishment. The Director shall establish and chair an Interagency Working Group on Antisemitism.

(b) Membership. The Working Group shall include senior designees from the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Education, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of State, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and such other agencies as the Director determines appropriate.

(c) Duties. The Working Group shall meet not less than quarterly; develop and implement a Rapid Response Protocol for major incidents ensuring the White House can mobilize federal resources within 24 hours of a qualifying incident; coordinate civil rights enforcement across agencies; develop consistent guidance and training standards for federal, state, and local law enforcement partners; and identify and eliminate duplicative federal programs.

Section 7. Core Functions of the Office

(a) National Incident Tracking. The Office shall establish and maintain a National Antisemitism Incident Tracking System, in coordination with the FBI and Department of Justice, updated not less than quarterly and made publicly accessible on the Office's website.

(b) Online Threats and Platform Coordination. The Office shall convene major online platforms to establish faster response channels for credible antisemitic threats; develop and publish transparency metrics covering platform response times and enforcement consistency; and coordinate referrals to the DOJ and FBI when online content crosses into unlawful conduct. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to authorize the Office to regulate or penalize constitutionally protected speech.

(c) Prevention and Education. The Office shall fund and coordinate evidence based antisemitism prevention programs; develop and disseminate training curricula for schools, universities, and other institutions; and support community security efforts consistent with civil liberties protections.

(d) Enforcement Coordination. The Office shall coordinate with the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division and the Department of Education Office for Civil Rights to ensure consistent, timely, and visible enforcement when antisemitism constitutes illegal discrimination in federally funded programs, schools, or universities.

Section 8. Advisory Council

The Director shall establish a bipartisan Advisory Council on Combating Antisemitism of not more than 20 members, including Jewish community leaders representing a diversity of denominations and regions; civil rights experts; law enforcement and national security professionals; education leaders; and civil liberties representatives to ensure the Office's activities remain consistent with First and Fourth Amendment protections. Members shall serve two year terms, meet not less than twice per year, and serve without compensation.

Section 9. Reporting and Public Accountability

(a) Annual Report to Congress. Not later than one year after the date of enactment, and annually thereafter, the Director shall submit to the relevant committees of Congress a comprehensive report including antisemitism trend data, a description of all federal programs and activities, an assessment of progress toward the National Strategy, identification of gaps requiring legislative action, performance metrics, and the joint coordination section with the White House Jewish Liaison.

(b) Public Dashboard. The Office shall maintain a publicly accessible online dashboard, updated not less than quarterly, displaying incident tracking data, status of active federal initiatives, rapid response activation records, and grant awards and community investments.

Section 10. Staffing and Budget

(a) Staffing. The Director is authorized to hire not more than 25 full time equivalent employees covering policy and interagency coordination, data collection and reporting, community engagement and outreach, communications, and online threat monitoring.

(b) Authorization of Appropriations. There is authorized to be appropriated $12,000,000 for each fiscal year to carry out this Act, to remain available until expended.

Section 11. Initial Implementation Deadlines

Within 90 days of confirmation: Convene the first Working Group meeting; designate agency liaisons; establish the National Incident Tracking System framework; publish the coordination protocol with the White House Jewish Liaison; and publish an initial national metrics framework.

Within 180 days of confirmation: Issue a federal guidance package for educational institutions; publish a best practices toolkit for communities; and activate the Rapid Response Protocol.

Within 12 months of confirmation: Submit the first annual report to Congress; launch the fully operational public dashboard; and publish measurable performance targets for the second year of operations.

Section 12. Relationship to Existing Law and Offices

(a) No Preemption. Nothing in this Act shall limit or supersede the existing civil rights enforcement authorities of the Department of Justice, the Department of Education, or any other federal agency.

(b) Coordination with Special Envoy. The Director shall maintain regular coordination with the U.S. Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism at the Department of State to ensure consistency between domestic and international antisemitism response efforts.

(c) Supersession of Executive Only Efforts. Upon the Director's confirmation, any existing executive branch task forces addressing antisemitism shall be formally incorporated into or coordinated with the Office, to the extent practicable, to ensure continuity of effort.

Section 13. Severability

If any provision of this Act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Act and its application to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected.

Section 14. Effective Date

This Act shall take effect 180 days after the date of enactment.

Definitions

"Antisemitism" means hostility toward, prejudice against, or discrimination against Jewish people as individuals or as a group, including the targeting of the State of Israel when such targeting is motivated by or equivalent to antisemitism as defined by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition.

"Director" means the Director of the White House Office to Combat Antisemitism appointed under Section 4.

"Office" means the White House Office to Combat Antisemitism established under Section 3.

"Working Group" means the Interagency Working Group on Antisemitism established under Section 6.

"Advisory Council" means the Advisory Council on Combating Antisemitism established under Section 8.

Draft prepared by Kincaid for Congress as a legislative framework. Specific provisions are subject to refinement in coordination with legal counsel, relevant committee staff, and constitutional authorities upon election to Congress.

Comments

Popular Posts

Nurse Assault Prevention and Accountability Act of 2027

Nurse Assault Prevention and Accountability Act of 2027 Protecting the People Who Take Care of Us Overview Protecting the People Who Protect Us Every day across America, nurses, certified nursing assistants (CNAs), and frontline healthcare workers walk into hospitals, clinics, and long term care facilities not knowing whether they will be respected or threatened spat on, shoved, or worse. They are not asking for praise. They are asking for protection. According to recent data, nearly three out of four workplace violence incidents in the private sector occur in healthcare settings. Seventy five percent. Nurses are punched. CNAs are attacked. Emergency room staff are threatened not just during pandemics, but during routine shifts in everyday hospitals, in everyday America. And yet, in many states, if someone assaults a nurse throws a punch, delivers a slap, or spits in their face  there may be no serious consequences whatsoever. In too many places, it is treated as a minor m...

Kincaid’s statement on Microsoft job cuts

A Few Words on the Recent Microsoft Job Cuts Back in the old days, if you spoke out against a major employer, people would warn you: "Be careful  this is a company town." Well, Washington State today is essentially a company state. Taking on Microsoft directly would be political suicide for most. Let me be clear: I am not attacking Microsoft, and I am not looking to start a fight with them. But I do think some of their decisions deserve a closer look. Stock Buybacks vs. Real Investment Over the past ten years, Microsoft has spent roughly $170 billion on stock buybacks. That practice is not unusual among large corporations, but it raises a fair question. Instead of artificially inflating its own share price, could some of that money have been put to better use . Invested in people, in innovation, and in the communities that made Microsoft what it is today? Re-examining the H-1B Visa Program We should also take a hard look at the H-1B visa program. Companies claim...

Kincaid's statement on Olympus Spa " Olympus Spa Is the Hill I'm Willing to Die On "

Let's Save Olympus Spa I was genuinely shocked when I learned what happened to Olympus Spa in Lynnwood. I kept asking myself. How? Why? How is something like this even possible in America? At first, I assumed this would never hold up in court. I thought there was no way the people of Washington had voted for this. And I was right they didn't. The voters never decided this. The state legislature did. They passed a law declaring that a biological male including one with male genitalia could be legally recognized as a woman by the state. A new driver's license. A new legal designation. And then the state turned to places like Olympus Spa a women only business where patrons are nude  and said: "You must let him in. Or we will sue you." It did not matter that female customers were deeply uncomfortable being unclothed around biological males. It did not matter that this directly violated the sincere religious beliefs of a Korean owned women's spa. It did n...

Kincaid’s Strategy to End Homelessness

Three Crises, Three Solutions: A New Approach to Homelessness Current homelessness policy has failed. It is time for an honest, structured, and compassionate response . One that matches the cause to the cure. "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." By that definition, the way America deals with homelessness is insanity. Turning the streets into the new asylums is insanity. Allowing people to set up drug dens on the sidewalk is insanity. Allowing people with severe mental illness to live on the sidewalk is insanity. An elderly woman lost her eye because of this insanity. Many innocent people have been killed because of this insanity. Almost daily, we encounter people showing signs of mental illness or who are under the influence of drugs on the streets, on buses, on trains. This is obviously a threat to public safety. It is insanity. It is not compassion for the homeless. It is not compassion for the elde...

Proposal: No Federal Income Tax for Persons Earning $61,000 or Less

No Federal Income Tax or Tax Filing for People Earning $61,000 or Less Summary This proposal would eliminate federal individual income tax liability for people earning $61,000 or less in total wage income, simplifying the tax system for tens of millions of working Americans while having minimal impact on federal revenue. In practical terms, anyone earning approximately $29.33 per hour or less would pay zero federal income tax and would no longer be required to file a tax return each year. Payroll taxes  Social Security and Medicare would still be deducted from paychecks as they are today. Beyond that, nothing. No additional federal tax withheld. No annual filing requirement. Rationale Based on IRS data from the past decade (2013–2022), households earning $61,000 or less make up approximately 50 to 60 percent of all U.S. tax filers. Yet this group contributes only 2 to 3 percent of all federal individual income tax revenue roughly $53 to $79 billion per year, depending o...

The Tragic Failure Behind the Lawrence Reed / Bethany MaGee Case

The System Failed And an Innocent Woman Paid the Price The Tragic Case of Bethany McGee, Lawrence Reed, and Why We Must Reform Civil Commitment Laws When violent repeat offenders are allowed to roam freely despite decades of documented warning signs, innocent people are left playing Russian roulette simply by going about their daily lives. We must bring back long term psychiatric care. We must reform civil commitment laws. And we must stop pretending that what we are doing is working. Just months after Iryna Zarutska was randomly stabbed in the neck and killed on a train in North Carolina, another senseless attack occurred  this time on a train in Chicago. On November 17, 2025, Bethany McGee, a 26-year-old woman, was riding the CTA Blue Line when a man named Lawrence Reed poured gasoline on her and set her on fire. She was left fighting for her life. As horrifying as this attack was, it should not have come as a surprise. It was the predictable result of a system that had i...

KINCAID Exploratory Committee

Updated April 2026 Today, I am announcing my candidacy for Congress in Washington's 1st Congressional District. I have filed official candidacy paperwork with the Federal Election Commission. I am a Democrat challenging fellow Democrat Representative Suzan DelBene, who has held this seat for more than 12 years. State filing will be completed during Washington State's filing period of May 4 - 8, 2026. Washington State ranks among the worst states in the nation for retirees  largely due to the cost of living. But affordability is unlikely to be a personal concern for Representative DelBene. Like so many career politicians, her personal wealth has grown dramatically during her time in office. According to Quiver Quantitative, her net worth has more than doubled since she was first elected  from $60 million to an estimated $141.5 million. That may sound extraordinary, but it is not unusual. More than half of all members of Congress are millionaires. I am not criticizing anyo...

Statement from Kincaid: To the people of Bellevue’s Eastgate neighborhood regarding the homeless shelters

Understanding the Problem Before we can solve this problem, it is important to understand how it originated. Did the people of Bellevue want, ask for, or vote for homeless shelters in Eastgate? So how did this happen? A small ruling class a group of people who believe they are superior to everyone else made this decision. King County, Bellevue, Kirkland, and Redmond came together and reached an agreement to move forward with these shelters. It is important to note that this agreement was not legally binding . Bellevue was under no legal obligation to participate. The agreement called for Bellevue, Kirkland, and Redmond to host homeless facilities operated by Plymouth Housing and it did not matter what residents had to say. The facilities were going to be built regardless. The public hearings and the Bellevue City Council vote were little more than formalities. There was very strong opposition to the Eastgate location, and that opposition was ignored. To the People of Eastgate a...

Kincaid’s Statement on Antisemitic Attack Against Jewish Student in Seattle

What happened to a 15-year-old Jewish girl at Nathan Hale High School in Seattle is not just deeply disturbing. It is a case study in how antisemitism spreads when institutions fail to confront it  and in how that failure, left unchecked, produces something genuinely terrifying. This is racism. This is hate. This is evil. And the response from the school system made it worse. I call upon the Mayor of Seattle, the Governor of Washington, the State Attorney General, and all city, state, and federal representatives to condemn this attack without hesitation. I urge them to fully investigate every student and staff member involved  and to offer their unwavering support to the victim and her family. The people of Seattle and the entire state of Washington should be horrified that this happened. We should be embarrassed. We should be ashamed. There is an infection of evil spreading in our country, and this case is one of the most chilling symptoms. I fear what the students ...

Kincaid’s Gun Control Policy

Gun Safety That Works: Stopping Gun Theft Before It Happens There is a significant gap in the national debate on gun control policy. The overwhelming focus has been on laws that do little or nothing to protect people from the daily street crime happening in communities across the country. Far too little attention has been paid to stolen handguns  and to preventing guns from being stolen in the first place. Home invasions and vehicle thefts happen every day, and in many cases they result in firearms being stolen. A criminal should not be able to smash a car window and walk away with a bag full of guns in a matter of minutes. Yet right now, in most of America, that is exactly what can happen  with minimal consequence for anyone. Only 16 states and the District of Columbia require gun owners to report a lost or stolen firearm. Think about that for a moment. There is no federal law requiring the secure storage of guns. A child safety lock may be included with a firearm purch...