Skip to main content

Kincaid Gun Control Policy

Kincaid for Congress 2026



             I feel there has been a big whole in the debate on gun control policy. I feel that the focus has been on laws that will do nothing. To protect people from the daily street crime that is happening. They has never been a focus on stolen handguns. And on preventing guns from getting stolen. As you know. Home invasions and car break ins happen every day. And many times this results in guns being stolen. A criminal should not be able to simply break a glass window. And then walk away with a bag full of guns. In a matter of minutes. There is no federal law requiring the secured storage of guns. A child safety lock comes with a gun. But there is no real requirement that you use it. And that doesn’t prevent a gun from being stolen. Like a lock box or safe would. A few states have laws requiring the safe storage of guns. But most do not. So right now. Preventing someone from just leaving their gun. In the glove box of their car. And if that gun is stolen and used in a crime. Nothing will happen to them. Right now someone could have a dozen guns in their home. And they is no law requiring them to keep the guns in a safe. 

This is the problem. From 2017 through 2021, over 1.07 million firearms were reported stolen averaging roughly 200,000 guns stolen per year.  A big freaking problem in my opinion. A problem that there is not a major focus on. 

I feel that my gun policy should get support from both democrats and republicans. Even the NRA and all responsible gun owners . Because gun safety requires safe storage of gun. I am sure no one wants there gun. To end up in the hands of criminals. 


đŸ”’ Gun Safety That Works: Stopping Gun Theft Before It Happens



Every day in America, legally purchased handguns are stolen from cars, homes, and closets and end up in the hands of criminals. These aren’t rare events. They are the backbone of street crime in our cities.



The Problem



While many politicians focus on mass shootings, most gun violence in America happens one bullet at a time with stolen handguns used in robberies, assaults, and drive-by shootings. Each year, hundreds of thousands of firearms are stolen, often from unsecured vehicles and homes. These weapons flood our streets, with minimal accountability for how they got there.



Our Solution: Responsible Gun Ownership Means Safe Storage



I’m proposing a Secure Storage Law that requires firearms to be locked when not in use just like we expect drivers to use seat belts and parents to use car seats.



Here’s what it means:



  • Every firearm must be stored in a lock box or gun safe when not under direct control.
  • Vehicles and homes are covered. If  a gun is left unattended, it must be secured.
  • If a gun is stolen because it wasn’t secured, the owner can be held accountable.
  • Firearm owners must report stolen guns within 48 hours no exceptions.




Why This Matters



  • Over 80% of stolen guns are handguns, and many are used in crimes within days of being stolen.
  • In cities across the U.S., guns left in cars are now the #1 source of illegal firearms.
  • This law protects families, communities, and gun owners themselves by helping prevent their guns from being used in crimes.




This Isn’t a Gun Ban—It’s a Safety Standard



If you can afford a $500 handgun, you can afford a  lock box. Requiring responsible storage won’t stop anyone from buying a gun but it can stop someone else from stealing one and using it to commit a crime.



Enhanced Secure Storage Standards (Campaign Policy Update)



To prevent stolen firearms from fueling street crime, every gun owner must secure their firearm with a lock box or safe that meets minimum technical safety standards.



đŸ”¹ Storage Requirements:



1. For Handguns:


  • Must be secured in a DOJ-certified lock box or equivalent that:
    • Is made of steel or equivalent hardened material
    • Has a tamper-resistant locking mechanism (key, combination, or biometric)
    • Is certified by:
      • California DOJ Firearm Safety Device standards, or
      • UL 1037/UL 1610 standards (Underwriters Laboratories), or
      • ASTM F2456 or similar pry-resistance specifications




2. For Rifles/Shotguns:


  • Must be stored in a gun cabinet or safe that:
    • Has a mechanical or electronic lock
    • Is bolted to the structure or floor, or
    • Weighs over 150 lbs to prevent easy removal
    • Meets UL Residential Security Container (RSC) certification or California DOJ approval



3. For Firearms in Vehicles:


  • Must be placed in a hard-sided, opaque, locked container secured within the vehicle
  • The vehicle must be locked
  • If stored in a soft case (e.g. rifle bag), it must include a trigger or cable lock meeting the same safety standards






đŸ§¾ Proof of Compliance:



  • When purchasing a firearm, buyers must attest to having compliant storage, or purchase one on-site. After purchasing a new firearm. Depending on the type and storage required . The person will bring the storage device to police or other law enforcement. To confirm you have the proper storage device. Or law enforcement will come to your home to confirm. And will continue to confirm once a year. That you have the proper storage for the amount of firearms you own.
  • Retailers will be incentivized to stock certified lock boxes/safes and provide discounts or bundled pricing.
  • A tax credit of up will be offered for first-time safe purchases.






đŸ”§ Why These Standards Matter:



  • Not all safes or boxes are created equal many $20 models can be opened in seconds with basic tools.
  • By requiring certified, tested storage, we reduce the likelihood of theft and increase accountability for gun owners.
  • This policy supports law-abiding owners who take firearm security seriously, while making it harder for stolen guns to fuel daily crime.






Let’s compare my proposal for a federal  secure storage law. With the proposal for a state law in Washington. HB 1152 , is currently on the table. It has no specific standards for a lockbox or safe. Just some vague general standards. I feel that is a mistake. It also requires handguns stored in vehicles. To be kept unloaded. I feel that that is also a mistake. And will make the law difficult to win support. If it is kept in secure storage. There would be no need for it to be kept unloaded. In the event of an emergency. And the gun owner goes to retrieve the gun. Might not have time to load it. In the event of something like an attempted car jacking. They should be able to use it immediately. They are also other key differences between the two proposals. I feel that my proposal is better. And they should move HB 1152 into the direction of my proposal.


Next, let’s compare my proposal for a secure gun storage law with Ethan’s Law. 

  • Scope and Specificity: My policy offers a more comprehensive approach by covering all firearms and including specific standards for storage devices, as well as addressing vehicle storage. Ethan’s Law focuses primarily on preventing unauthorized access by minors and prohibited individuals within homes.
  • Enforcement and Compliance: My proposal includes proactive measures such as mandatory proof of compliant storage and annual checks, whereas Ethan’s Law relies on penalties post-incident without routine compliance verification.
  • Preventive Measures: By emphasizing theft prevention my policy aims to address broader issues of gun violence and unauthorized use beyond child access.
  • Legislative Progress: Ethan’s Law has been introduced and passed in the House on June 8, 2022. But has gotten nowhere since then. 
  • My proposal for a secure storage law is better. It is what is needed. 




Real Safety. Not Soundbites.



This isn’t about ideology. It’s about facts, responsibility, and saving lives. Let’s make gun safety work for everyone. If I am elected to Congress in 2026. This will be one of my top priorities. But let’s not wait to 2026. I invite all members of the Democratic Party . To start work on this issue now.


Kincaid For Congress in 2026


Gun Control is a very big issue and very big problem. Requiring many components. Secure Storage is just one component. Another component is smart guns.  Just like there are tax incentives for electric vehicles. There should be tax credits or rebates for smart guns. For example. Currently the Biofire Smart Gun is between 1, 500 to 2,000 . We need to cut the price down to about 500 for mass adoption. These are two of the things I will be focusing on. But not the only things. As I said before. Gun control requires many components.


I also have a specific policy on protecting schools. I will be releasing that information in the future.




I invite the public to comment on this policy. I hope you all vote for me in 2026. But if you don’t vote for me. I hope you will support this policy.





#project2029  Project 2029

Comments

Popular Posts

Kincaid's statement on Olympus Spa " Olympus Spa Is the Hill I'm Willing to Die On "

Let’s save Olympus Spa. I was truly shocked when I learned about the injustice that happened to Olympus Spa in Lynnwood. Honestly. I kept thinking WTF over and over again. Why? How? How is something like this even possible? At first, I thought  this insanity would never hold up in court. I thought, “No way the people of Washington voted for this.” And I was right  they didn’t . The voters didn’t decide this. The state legislature did. They passed a law saying that a biological man   yes, even a man with male genitalia  could put on a wig and a dress, and the state would declare him legally a woman . They would give him a new driver’s license with an “F” on it. And then they’d turn to places like Olympus Spa , a women only business where patrons are nude, and say: “You have to let him in. Or we’ll sue you.” It didn’t matter that female customers were uncomfortable being naked around men. It didn’t matter that this violated the Christian beliefs of a Korean-owned ...

Proposal: No Federal Income Tax for Persons Earning $61,000 or Less

No Federal Income Tax and Tax Filing for People Earning 61,000 or Less Summary This proposal would eliminate federal individual income tax liability for people earning $61,000 or less in total wage income, simplifying the tax system for tens of millions of working Americans while having minimal impact on federal revenue. So those people  making about 29.33 an hour and under. Would pay zero federal income tax . And would not be required to file a tax return every year.  Payroll taxes would still be taken out of paychecks . For example Social Security and Medicare . And that's it no federal tax taken out of paychecks.  Rationale Based on IRS data from the past decade (2013–2022), households earning $61,000 or less make up approximately 50–60% of all U.S. tax filers. This group contributes only 2–3% of all federal individual income tax revenue, equal to $53–$79 billion per year, depending on the year. That amount  is a rounding error in the Department of Defense. ...

Kincaid’s Statement on Antisemitic Attack Against Jewish Student in Seattle

This is a deeply disturbing case of antisemitism targeting a 15 year old Jewish girl at her high school in Seattle. This is racism. This is hate. This is evil. What the other students did to her is unconscionable and so is the failure of the school system to protect her. I call upon the Mayor of Seattle, the Governor of Washington, the State Attorney General, and all city, state, and federal representatives to condemn this act without hesitation. I urge them to fully investigate the students and staff involved, and to offer their unwavering support to the victim and her family. The people of Seattle and the entire state of Washington should be horrified that this happened. We should be embarrassed. We should be ashamed. There is an infection of evil spreading in our country, and this case is one of the most chilling symptoms. I fear what the students who committed this act may be capable of as adults if this hatred is  left unchecked. Case Outline : Antisemitism at Nathan H...

KINCAID Exploratory Committee

  Announcing Exploratory Committee for Washington’s 1st Congressional District Today, I am announcing the formation of an exploratory committee to run for Congress in Washington’s 1st District. I am a Democrat and if I run, I will likely be challenging fellow Democrat, Representative Suzan DelBene, who has held this seat for over 12 years. The state of Washington ranks as one of the worst states to retire in. One major reason is affordability. But that won’t be a problem for Representative DelBene because like so many politicians, her net worth has skyrocketed during her time in office. In fact, according to Quiver Quantitative, it has more than doubled from $60 million to $126.34 million. That may sound shocking, but it’s not unusual. More than half of all members of Congress are millionaires. And among the top 10 wealthiest members, Suzan DelBene is number eight. Let me be clear: I’m not attacking people for being rich. I’d love to be rich. I have no doubt that being rich is fant...

Shine a light on child marriage in America

  "In the absence of light, darkness prevails" is a quote from the first Hellboy movie. It came out in 2004. For some reason, that line has always stuck with me. When it comes to darkness or evil. It is profoundly true. When it comes to child marriage. Most people think it is something that only happens in foreign countries. Most people have no idea that it happens in America. In 2019, Brazil banned child marriage for those under 16. And recently, Colombia made the minimum age to marry 18 with no exceptions for pregnancy or parental consent. America needs to catch up with Colombia and the rest of the world. As of 2025, only about a dozen states have banned child marriage outright (18 with no exceptions). In many other states, minors as young as 16, 15, or even 14 can still marry under certain circumstances. Some common exceptions that allow child marriage are parental consent. Judicial approval (the judge can waive the age requirement). Pregnancy exceptions (some states al...

Long history of failure to protect women from sexual assault at Peace Corps

           Proposal to Sunset the Peace Corps and Redirect Funding to the Universal Pilot Health Plan Executive Summary This proposal recommends the complete shutdown of the Peace Corps and the permanent redirection of its funding to support the Universal Pilot Health Plan. The Peace Corps has suffered from decades of systemic failure to protect its female volunteers from sexual assault. Despite legislative efforts, including the Kate Puzey Act of 2011, internal reforms have failed to produce transparency, accountability, or meaningful protection for vulnerable service members. This is not merely a failure of policy it is a moral failure of the institution. We cannot tolerate government inaction when it comes to sexual violence. The Peace Corps has lost the trust of the public and of the volunteers it claims to serve. It is time to shut it down. I. Justification for Dissolution A. Systemic and Ongoing Failure Over 350 rapes and attempted rapes have been re...

Healthcare Policy - Proposal for Universal Healthcare Beta Test

A Real-World Proposal for Universal Healthcare: Phase-by-Phase Before a tech company launches a new product, they beta test it. Before a car hits the road, it goes through years of prototyping and testing. But when it comes to healthcare, we act like our only option is to either leave everything broken or bulldoze the entire system overnight. That’s why every push for Medicare for All has failed. It’s not that the idea is wrong. It’s that the rollout has never been realistic.   Bernie Sanders and others have introduced Medicare for All legislation twelve times since 2003. And every single time it dies in committee. It never even makes it to a vote.  Not even when Democrats controlled the House, the Senate, and the White House did it move forward. That should tell us something. It’s not about the idea, it’s about the approach.  That’s why we need a new strategy. A practical, testable, step-by-step strategy. And that’s exactly what the Universal Healthcare Beta Test is...

Kincaid Immigration Policy

                                        A Real Discussion On Immigration This nation has never had a real conversation about immigration. Not the conversation we need , the one that asks how we got here, why tensions are rising, and what kind of society we want to build. Instead, we get sound bites and photo ops. Politicians from both parties offer slogans, not solutions. They tell us, “these are jobs Americans won’t do,” and that “we need immigrants to keep prices low.” That’s the full extent of the conversation. But it’s not honest  and it’s not enough. Here’s the truth: Today in America, 42% of our agricultural workers are undocumented immigrants. So are 23% of construction workers. This isn’t a system built on fairness  it’s one built on exploitation. We have created an economy that depends on people who live in the shadows. A system where millions are essential ...