Skip to main content

Healthcare Policy - Proposal for Universal Healthcare Beta Test

Kincaid for Congress



A Real World Proposal for Universal Healthcare: A Phase by Phase Plan

Before a tech company launches a new product, it runs a beta test. Before a car hits the road, it goes through years of prototyping and safety evaluation. But when it comes to healthcare reform, the political debate has offered Americans only two choices: leave a broken system untouched, or tear down the entire thing overnight. That is why every push for Medicare for All has failed  and it will keep failing.

This is not a criticism of the goal. The goal is right. The problem has always been the strategy.

Bernie Sanders and others have introduced Medicare for All legislation twelve times since 2003. Every single time, it has died in committee. It has never made it to a floor vote  not even when Democrats controlled the House, the Senate, and the White House simultaneously. That should tell us something important. The obstacle is not the idea. The obstacle is the approach.

We need a fundamentally different strategy. One that is practical, testable, and built to actually pass. That is exactly what the Universal Healthcare Beta Test is designed to be.

Instead of attempting to flip the entire American healthcare system overnight, we start with a single real world pilot program  a fully public hospital network rebuilt from the ground up. We test it. We measure every outcome. We prove it works. And then we build from there.

This proposal has something that Medicare for All has never had: a realistic path to becoming law. This is not just a healthcare plan. It is a roadmap for making real, durable progress in America  one hospital at a time.


Phase One: The Beta Test

We start small and smart. We take $16 billion  a modest fraction of total federal health spending  and use it to acquire and reopen Crozer Chester Medical Center and Taylor Hospital in Pennsylvania. Both facilities were gutted by private equity. Both could become the foundation of America's first prototype universal healthcare system.

Here is how Phase One works:

  • The pilot program is open to all residents within a 30 mile radius of either facility.
  • It accepts private insurance while also offering a new public coverage option.
  • One billion dollars per year would fund operations over five years, with any unspent capital placed into a reserve fund managed by HHS.
  • Throughout those five years, we collect realm world data. Cost per patient, health outcomes, staffing efficiency, and patient satisfaction.

No theories. No projections based on other countries' systems. Just facts  gathered in America, from American patients, in American facilities. This would be the first genuine test site in United States history for what universal healthcare could actually look like.


Phase Two: Scaled Testing

If Phase One succeeds and the data shows it works we move to Phase Two. We build or acquire up to five additional hospitals or integrated medical campuses across different regions of the country. Each serves as a regional center for expanded testing with broader populations and varied demographics. Again, we collect data. We identify and fix what does not work. We preserve and scale what does.


Phase Three: National Rollout with Real Choice

Once the model has been proven through two phases of real world testing, we do not eliminate private insurance. We do not issue mandates. We offer a genuine choice.

  • Every American would have access to a Universal Healthcare card accepted at all participating facilities.
  • Coverage would be income-based: individuals earning over $30,000 pay $50–$100 per month, couples earning over $60,000 pay $100–$200 per month.
  • All covered services included no co-pays, no deductibles, no claim denials.

If the public plan is better, Americans will choose it. They will not need to be forced. And if it is not better, we will know that too because we will have the data to prove it either way.


Why This Is the Only Realistic Path Forward

We will never get the votes to nationalize the American healthcare system overnight. That is not a political opinion  it is a political reality, and pretending otherwise has cost the reform movement decades of progress.

But a measured, phased, evidence based approach rooted in local success and transparent data? That is a conversation we can have across the aisle. That is a bill that can build momentum. And if we do this right  if we prove it works in Pennsylvania, and then in five more regions, and then nationally Republicans will not need to be forced. Their own constituents will be demanding it.


Proposed Legislation

Universal Healthcare Innovation and Pilot Act (UHIPA) — Phase One

Section 1. Title

This Act shall be known as the "Universal Healthcare Innovation and Pilot Act of 2025."

Section 2. Purpose

The purpose of this Act is to:

  • Establish a regional, publicly funded universal healthcare pilot program.
  • Evaluate real world healthcare delivery across the dimensions of cost, access, outcomes, and operational feasibility.
  • Create a scalable, data driven model to inform any future expansion of national health coverage.

Section 3. Authorization of Funds

(a) Acquisition and Reopening of Medical Facilities

There is authorized to be appropriated $16,000,000,000 for the following purposes:

  • Acquiring ownership of Crozer Chester Medical Center and Taylor Hospital, located in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
  • Reopening and refurbishing both facilities for public operation.
  • Hiring qualified public health and hospital administration personnel.
  • Funding immediate startup and infrastructure development costs.

(b) Operational Budget

An additional $1,000,000,000 per fiscal year for five fiscal years is authorized for:

  • Hospital operations, staffing, maintenance, and healthcare delivery.
  • Data collection, health information technology systems, community outreach, and research.
  • Any unspent funds shall be placed into a reserve fund managed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

Section 4. Patient Eligibility and Enrollment

(a) Eligibility

  • All residents living within a 30 mile radius of either facility shall be eligible to enroll in the Universal Pilot Health Plan (UPHP).
  • Enrollment shall be entirely voluntary and shall not disqualify enrollees from maintaining existing private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, or VA benefits.

(b) Services Covered

The UPHP shall cover:

  • Primary and specialty care
  • Emergency and inpatient services
  • Prescription drugs
  • Preventive care
  • Mental and behavioral health services
  • Vision and dental services
  • Long-term care based on documented medical need

(c) Payment Structure

  • Enrollees shall pay no out of pocket costs for any covered services.
  • Private insurance may continue to be used for all services or for services not covered under the pilot program.

Section 5. Data Collection and Reporting

The Secretary of HHS shall oversee independent evaluation of the following metrics:

  • Cost per patient and per procedure
  • Health outcomes
  • Staffing and operational efficiency
  • Patient satisfaction and enrollment trends

Annual reports shall be submitted to Congress beginning one year after program launch. A final comprehensive evaluation report shall be submitted to Congress by the end of Year Five.

Section 6. Sunset and Transition

Unless extended by Congressional reauthorization, the pilot program shall sunset six years after initial funding is appropriated, allowing one year for orderly program wrap up and participant transition. All data collected during the program shall be transmitted to Congress and used to determine the feasibility of Phase Two implementation in additional regions of the country.

Section 7. Definitions

  • "UPHP" means the Universal Pilot Health Plan established under this Act.
  • "Secretary" means the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, Courage to change the things I can, And wisdom to know the difference.

Comments

Popular Posts

Nurse Assault Prevention and Accountability Act of 2027

Nurse Assault Prevention and Accountability Act of 2027 Protecting the People Who Take Care of Us Overview Protecting the People Who Protect Us Every day across America, nurses, certified nursing assistants (CNAs), and frontline healthcare workers walk into hospitals, clinics, and long term care facilities not knowing whether they will be respected or threatened spat on, shoved, or worse. They are not asking for praise. They are asking for protection. According to recent data, nearly three out of four workplace violence incidents in the private sector occur in healthcare settings. Seventy five percent. Nurses are punched. CNAs are attacked. Emergency room staff are threatened not just during pandemics, but during routine shifts in everyday hospitals, in everyday America. And yet, in many states, if someone assaults a nurse throws a punch, delivers a slap, or spits in their face  there may be no serious consequences whatsoever. In too many places, it is treated as a minor m...

Kincaid’s statement on Microsoft job cuts

A Few Words on the Recent Microsoft Job Cuts Back in the old days, if you spoke out against a major employer, people would warn you: "Be careful  this is a company town." Well, Washington State today is essentially a company state. Taking on Microsoft directly would be political suicide for most. Let me be clear: I am not attacking Microsoft, and I am not looking to start a fight with them. But I do think some of their decisions deserve a closer look. Stock Buybacks vs. Real Investment Over the past ten years, Microsoft has spent roughly $170 billion on stock buybacks. That practice is not unusual among large corporations, but it raises a fair question. Instead of artificially inflating its own share price, could some of that money have been put to better use . Invested in people, in innovation, and in the communities that made Microsoft what it is today? Re-examining the H-1B Visa Program We should also take a hard look at the H-1B visa program. Companies claim...

Kincaid's statement on Olympus Spa " Olympus Spa Is the Hill I'm Willing to Die On "

Let's Save Olympus Spa I was genuinely shocked when I learned what happened to Olympus Spa in Lynnwood. I kept asking myself. How? Why? How is something like this even possible in America? At first, I assumed this would never hold up in court. I thought there was no way the people of Washington had voted for this. And I was right they didn't. The voters never decided this. The state legislature did. They passed a law declaring that a biological male including one with male genitalia could be legally recognized as a woman by the state. A new driver's license. A new legal designation. And then the state turned to places like Olympus Spa a women only business where patrons are nude  and said: "You must let him in. Or we will sue you." It did not matter that female customers were deeply uncomfortable being unclothed around biological males. It did not matter that this directly violated the sincere religious beliefs of a Korean owned women's spa. It did n...

Kincaid’s Strategy to End Homelessness

Three Crises, Three Solutions: A New Approach to Homelessness Current homelessness policy has failed. It is time for an honest, structured, and compassionate response . One that matches the cause to the cure. "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." By that definition, the way America deals with homelessness is insanity. Turning the streets into the new asylums is insanity. Allowing people to set up drug dens on the sidewalk is insanity. Allowing people with severe mental illness to live on the sidewalk is insanity. An elderly woman lost her eye because of this insanity. Many innocent people have been killed because of this insanity. Almost daily, we encounter people showing signs of mental illness or who are under the influence of drugs on the streets, on buses, on trains. This is obviously a threat to public safety. It is insanity. It is not compassion for the homeless. It is not compassion for the elde...

Proposal: No Federal Income Tax for Persons Earning $61,000 or Less

No Federal Income Tax or Tax Filing for People Earning $61,000 or Less Summary This proposal would eliminate federal individual income tax liability for people earning $61,000 or less in total wage income, simplifying the tax system for tens of millions of working Americans while having minimal impact on federal revenue. In practical terms, anyone earning approximately $29.33 per hour or less would pay zero federal income tax and would no longer be required to file a tax return each year. Payroll taxes  Social Security and Medicare would still be deducted from paychecks as they are today. Beyond that, nothing. No additional federal tax withheld. No annual filing requirement. Rationale Based on IRS data from the past decade (2013–2022), households earning $61,000 or less make up approximately 50 to 60 percent of all U.S. tax filers. Yet this group contributes only 2 to 3 percent of all federal individual income tax revenue roughly $53 to $79 billion per year, depending o...

The Tragic Failure Behind the Lawrence Reed / Bethany MaGee Case

The System Failed And an Innocent Woman Paid the Price The Tragic Case of Bethany McGee, Lawrence Reed, and Why We Must Reform Civil Commitment Laws When violent repeat offenders are allowed to roam freely despite decades of documented warning signs, innocent people are left playing Russian roulette simply by going about their daily lives. We must bring back long term psychiatric care. We must reform civil commitment laws. And we must stop pretending that what we are doing is working. Just months after Iryna Zarutska was randomly stabbed in the neck and killed on a train in North Carolina, another senseless attack occurred  this time on a train in Chicago. On November 17, 2025, Bethany McGee, a 26-year-old woman, was riding the CTA Blue Line when a man named Lawrence Reed poured gasoline on her and set her on fire. She was left fighting for her life. As horrifying as this attack was, it should not have come as a surprise. It was the predictable result of a system that had i...

KINCAID Exploratory Committee

Updated April 2026 Today, I am announcing my candidacy for Congress in Washington's 1st Congressional District. I have filed official candidacy paperwork with the Federal Election Commission. I am a Democrat challenging fellow Democrat Representative Suzan DelBene, who has held this seat for more than 12 years. State filing will be completed during Washington State's filing period of May 4 - 8, 2026. Washington State ranks among the worst states in the nation for retirees  largely due to the cost of living. But affordability is unlikely to be a personal concern for Representative DelBene. Like so many career politicians, her personal wealth has grown dramatically during her time in office. According to Quiver Quantitative, her net worth has more than doubled since she was first elected  from $60 million to an estimated $141.5 million. That may sound extraordinary, but it is not unusual. More than half of all members of Congress are millionaires. I am not criticizing anyo...

Kincaid’s Statement on Antisemitic Attack Against Jewish Student in Seattle

What happened to a 15-year-old Jewish girl at Nathan Hale High School in Seattle is not just deeply disturbing. It is a case study in how antisemitism spreads when institutions fail to confront it  and in how that failure, left unchecked, produces something genuinely terrifying. This is racism. This is hate. This is evil. And the response from the school system made it worse. I call upon the Mayor of Seattle, the Governor of Washington, the State Attorney General, and all city, state, and federal representatives to condemn this attack without hesitation. I urge them to fully investigate every student and staff member involved  and to offer their unwavering support to the victim and her family. The people of Seattle and the entire state of Washington should be horrified that this happened. We should be embarrassed. We should be ashamed. There is an infection of evil spreading in our country, and this case is one of the most chilling symptoms. I fear what the students ...

Statement from Kincaid: To the people of Bellevue’s Eastgate neighborhood regarding the homeless shelters

Understanding the Problem Before we can solve this problem, it is important to understand how it originated. Did the people of Bellevue want, ask for, or vote for homeless shelters in Eastgate? So how did this happen? A small ruling class a group of people who believe they are superior to everyone else made this decision. King County, Bellevue, Kirkland, and Redmond came together and reached an agreement to move forward with these shelters. It is important to note that this agreement was not legally binding . Bellevue was under no legal obligation to participate. The agreement called for Bellevue, Kirkland, and Redmond to host homeless facilities operated by Plymouth Housing and it did not matter what residents had to say. The facilities were going to be built regardless. The public hearings and the Bellevue City Council vote were little more than formalities. There was very strong opposition to the Eastgate location, and that opposition was ignored. To the People of Eastgate a...

Kincaid’s Gun Control Policy

Gun Safety That Works: Stopping Gun Theft Before It Happens There is a significant gap in the national debate on gun control policy. The overwhelming focus has been on laws that do little or nothing to protect people from the daily street crime happening in communities across the country. Far too little attention has been paid to stolen handguns  and to preventing guns from being stolen in the first place. Home invasions and vehicle thefts happen every day, and in many cases they result in firearms being stolen. A criminal should not be able to smash a car window and walk away with a bag full of guns in a matter of minutes. Yet right now, in most of America, that is exactly what can happen  with minimal consequence for anyone. Only 16 states and the District of Columbia require gun owners to report a lost or stolen firearm. Think about that for a moment. There is no federal law requiring the secure storage of guns. A child safety lock may be included with a firearm purch...